http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/14/AR2009041402621.html

By Kathleen Parker
Tuesday, April 14, 2009; 6:11 PM

It isn't every day that one's very own hakapik arrives in the mail.

It is probably reasonable to assume that I'm the only person on my
block to be the un-proud possessor of the aptly named bludgeoning and
hacking instrument used to slaughter baby seals. 'Tis the season.

April 15 may be tax and tea-party day in the U.S., but it's baby-seal
death day in Canada. Although the season began March 23 (19,411 down),
the largest phase was to begin Wednesday, during which sealers will
destroy and skin another couple hundred thousand seals, most between
25 days and three months old.

It's a living. I guess.

Like most, I've known about the baby seal hunts for decades and have
averted my gaze. From my fetal curl, I've merely wished feverishly
that someone would put a stop to it.

I might have managed another year without weighing in on the world's
largest maritime massacre if not for my hakapik, delivered compliments
of PETA. It arrived innocuously enough in a flat, 5-foot long package.
ad_icon

Unsheathed, the hakapik is menacing -- like having a "Shining" Jack
Nicholson crouched in the corner -- and seems more suitable to an
exhibit of medieval torture instruments than to the office of someone
who delivers to the outdoors (rather than squishes) visiting insects.

My hakapik -- a phrase I never expected to utter -- has a 42-inch long
handle with a combo hammerhead/spike on the end. The hammer portion is
used, theoretically, to crush the seal's skull, while the spike is
used to haul the carcass away. (Older seals are usually shot with
rifles.)

Those who favor hakapiks argue that they are efficient and humane.
Efficient because they allow for a "clean kill," meaning the pelt
isn't damaged. "Humane" because a properly delivered blow to the head
causes instant, painless death.

Opponents of this gruesome drill claim it isn't possible to properly
administer a blow to the head when one is standing on a slippery ice
floe swinging a heavy club at a small moving animal. Consequently, at
least some animals are not killed humanely -- or even killed at all
before being skinned and gutted.

A 2007 European Food Safety Authority report concluded that effective
killing doesn't always occur, causing animals pain and distress.
Another 2007 report by scientists at the University of Bristol found
"widespread disregard for the Marine Mammal Regulations" during seal
hunts (though bashing the head of a defenseless baby hardly qualifies
as "hunting").

The researchers said that a maximum of 15 percent of seals observed on
videos were killed in a manner that conformed to the regulations and
that violations were probably worse because they didn't have access to
continuous sequences for all seals.

Andy Butterworth, senior research fellow, wrote that "although many of
the seals observed were clearly wounded by the clubbing and shooting,
sealers did not routinely monitor for unconsciousness (as required)
befoe skinning them."

Too gruesome to consider, but then, hunters argue, so are
slaughterhouses. The baby seal "harvest" is simply more visible than,
say the factories where baby calves and lambs are destroyed for
scaloppini and party chops. But does one cruelty justify another?

Increasingly, the answer is "no," as other countries follow the lead
of Americans, who banned seal products in 1972.

As of March 18, Russia has banned its own seal hunt after the bear-
hunting Vladimir Putin called sealing a "bloody industry." And, the
European Parliament has adopted a declaration banning commercial seal
products (but still allows for traditional hunting, e.g. Inuit). The
Parliament plans to vote on a complete ban later this month, which
could further emasculate the seal market.

In the meantime, market and other forces seem to be tilting favorably
toward the baby seals. Pelt prices are down from $100 per animal in
2006 to just $15 this year, thus undermining government claims of the
seals' economic importance.

In other news, which one may interpret as one wishes, the weather is
making life difficult for sealers. Strong winds and freezing rain have
been slowing them down. The pelts they seek so that human bipeds can
be fashionably warm are secure for the time being on the animals who
need them most.

Pressures, meanwhile, are mounting across the border where U.S. Sens.
Carl Levin, D-Mich., and Susan Collins, R-Maine, recently introduced a
resolution urging the Canadian government to end the commercial seal
hunt.

Come on, Canada. See things Putin's way and I'll donate my hakapik to
the museum of your choice.