Animal Advocates Watchdog

I agree with Diane's statement that "The tertiary and most immediate need is for the existing shelters to model their programs after the good rescue groups

Thank you to Diane Esther for so humbly admitting to her need for clarity in regard to issues which appear to me at times, overwhelming,complicated and confusing. Throughout the past two years I have watched, listened, absorbed and processed every action and piece of information I could to help me to gain a clearer understanding of the "elusive" solution to the big picture which Diane referred to in her post. In my opinion, I have been watching and listening to a person who "walks her talk" with dedication, conviction, determination,integrity and intelligence in a way I admire more than words can express. I have learned from the best and I look forward to gaining more knowledge and experience. I agree with Diane's statement that "The tertiary and most immediate need is for the existing shelters to model their programs after the good rescue groups: fostering animals in comfortable, safe homes instead of wire prisons, and conducting thorough home investigations for potential adoptors." That component of the solution,while obvious and simply stated,is not so easily accomplished. Having said that,I wholeheartedly believe it can be done.Many people are well aware of studies which have proven the benefits to human well-being, unconditionally given by animal companions. Would the reverse then not be true??? Does my emaciated, dehydrated, frightened and confused rescued cat not experience the benefits as I do when he snuggles in for the night under my bed covers??? How can we talk about physical, psychological and social rehabilitation in a safe, loving home with a knowledgeable person in the same context as "rehabilitation?" in a building full of cages???

Again, I refer to Diane's point regarding public education. That is a "must do" in order to initiate not only awareness and concern but also the realization that an individual who chooses inaction,is contributing to the problem,not the solution. I believe that an education program must address the necessity, responsibility and capability of each individual to become a part of that solution.The belief of each individual that he/she can make a difference will turn to action when the residents of our respective communities begin to view and understand animal welfare issues as aspects of society which clearly effect and personally touch the lives of the "human" as well as the "animal" population.

I also would be greatly encouraged to see administrators of the "wire cage" buildings spend significant quality time visiting home-based shelters and the foster homes which are carefully chosen to meet the specific needs of rescued animals placed in care.As Diane Esther stated so well," Perhaps they could take a multitude of lessons from good rescue centres, who operate with no budgets at all and provide the best of all services." Anyone who is seriously committed to learn what is best for the animals would welcome the opportunity.

Messages In This Thread

Dr Craig Brestrup: UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES: Shelters that “Euthanize” the Animals May be Prolonging the Very Problem they Seek to End *LINK*
Re: Dr Craig Brestrup: UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES: Current BC SPCA practises simply perpetuate the need for larger facilities with more staff and management
I agree with Diane's statement that "The tertiary and most immediate need is for the existing shelters to model their programs after the good rescue groups

Share