|
Animal Advocates
Society of BC
A COOPERATIVE OF ANIMAL-LOVERS AND ACTION-TAKERS
Charitable #887809267RR0001
Box 114,
103-2609 Westview Drive, North Vancouver, B.C.,
Canada V7N 4N2
Tel: 604-984-8826
Email us:
Copy and paste our address into an email:
Office@AnimalAdvocates.com
An all-volunteer
registered charitable organization dedicated to rescuing and
rehabilitating animals that official agencies will not help, getting
laws passed to stop animal cruelty, and exposing the reason why there is
so little help for suffering animals in B.C. from the BC SPCA. |
|
 |
|
Balm for the troubled soul...
AAS Happy Ending
stories... |
|
Home
About AAS |
|
Dogs for adoption
Cats for
adoption |
|
Alphabetical list of pages |
|
IT'S TIME!
The AAS Yard Dog
Report
The dogs and their stories
|
|
Report neglected dogs |
|
Print NO CHAINED DOGS petition |
|
Email your petition |
|
|
|
Women who steal dogs |
|
Dog bylaws |
|
Databases of breeders/sellers
Tracks puppymills,
backyard breeders, home retailers, and protection-dog breeders
in BC |
|
 |
|
Puppymill
investigations |
|
"Too Many Dogs"
AAS proposal for control of
breeding laws |
|
WHAT'S WRONG WITH THE BC SPCA?
AAS spent five years investigating and documenting the things that
people had been complaining of for fifty years and published them
in this web site.
Twice the SPCA used expensive
lawyers to try to silence us.
SEE THE EVIDENCE OF WHAT IS WRONG
|
|
SEIZE
AND KILL! or RESCUE AND SAVE?
TWO CASES: A
COMPARISON AND OUTCOME
CASE ONE: TOPAZ CREEK DOGS: RESCUED AND SAVED BY CRESTON PAWS
SOCIETY
CASE TWO: BEAVERDELL DOGS: SEIZED AND KILLED BY THE KELOWNA
BC SPCA
Fifty some odd northern mixed-breed dogs tied to trees,
neglected and desocialized for years. One group in Topaz Creek BC,
one in Beaverdell BC. Two remarkably similar situations, handled
by two remarkably different organizations with radically different
strategies and outcomes. Scientists themselves couldn't have
created two better control groups.
Pictures and stories here |
|
 Yard/guard dogs - should keeping dogs in yards 24/7 be banned?
Yes
No
View result without voting
More
information about chained dogs
"IN
MEMORIAM"
Remembering people who loved
animals, and animals who were loved by people
|
|
Copyright AAS 2000-2004 |
|
|
The Prevention of Cruelty to
Animals Act, which governs the BC SPCA, states clearly that the SPCA
must file AUDITED statements
Posted By: AAS
Date: Saturday, 5 June 2004, at 10:23 a.m.
Corporate duties and obligations
9 (1) The society must
(4) Within 14 days after the annual general meeting, the society
must file with the Registrar of Companies
(a) in respect of the society and each of its branches,
audited financial statements, each in the form of a balance
sheet containing general particulars of assets and liabilities, and
a statement of income and expenditure.....
At the BC SPCA Annual General Meeting in 2002, Treasurer Randy
Reynolds stated that the BC SPCA had never filed audited statements.
Entreaties to government to make the SPCA obey the law are
ignored.
Minister John van Dongen is
responsible for the SPCA legislation and to the public. Where is his
oversight of the B.C. SPCA's financial situation?
Graham Currie, spokesman for the
Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, said the government does
not intend to intervene in the affairs of the B.C. SPCA, a private
organization.
He said the society has filed the
paperwork required under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act.
Read the PCA Act at...
http://www.qp.gov.bc.ca/statreg/stat/P/96372_01.htm#section5
CKNW: Animal Welfare Coalition
criticizes SPCA finances and secrecy
Posted By: AAS
Date: Monday, 7 June 2004, at 5:12 a.m.
Tracy Pellizzari: A Coalition of animal welfare groups says the
BC SPCA's take on its financial outlook is way off. After the
Society's Annual General Meeting last week, where a 4.6 million
dollar deficit was revealed, Past-President Rick Sargent expressed
optimism that the SPCA's plan to turn around their financial
fortunes was working. He noted a new CEO and finance manager started
to get spending under control in the last six months of 2003. The BC
SPCA Animal Welfare Coalition says in the first quarter of this year
the SPCA is already 900,000 dollars in the hole, paving the way for
what they called "another stunning deficit in 2004." While Sargent
placed part of the blame on the Provincial Government for not giving
the SPCA more funding, the Coalition argues the top-heavy SPCA
administration and a failure to provide accurate information to the
public is really to blame. BC's Management Services Minister says
she needs more time to look over 28 recommendations for updating the
Freedom of Information Act before she makes any decisions. Among
those the Legislative Committee has called for a review of the
SPCA's status. The Committee notes the SPCA is both a public body
and society and yet is exempt from the Society Act and the Freedom
of Information. Joyce Murray says she needs to give the matter due
diligence before deciding whether to take action. Critics complain
the SPCA exemptions make it difficult to review how the money-losing
organization does business.
- NEW: CKNW: Animal
Welfare Coalition criticizes SPCA finances and secrecy
AAS -- Monday, 7 June 2004, at 5:12 a.m.
- NEW:
CKNW: In the wake of the 4.6 million dollar deficit revealed by
the BC SPCA last week
AAS -- Monday, 7 June 2004, at 5:16 a.m.
- NEW:
CKNW: Only the BCSPCA could say things are getting better when it
broke the 2002 record 4.5 million dollar deficit with a 4.6
million one last year
AAS -- Monday, 7 June 2004, at 5:20 a.m.
- NEW:
The Province: The SPCA has lost more than $10 million since 2000
AAS -- Monday, 7 June 2004, at 5:47 a.m.
The SPCA has been playing fast and
loose with the words 'audited statements' for a couple of years *LINK*
Posted By: AAS
Date: Friday, 4 June 2004, at 6:26 p.m.
BC SPCA web page "Tall Tails" was edited!
The SPCA, especially its spinmistress Lorie Chortyk, has been
playing fast and loose with the words audited statements for a
couple of years. When asked, especially by the media, they
disingenuously answer that financial statements are available to the
public, leaving out the word "audited". But sometimes they actually
claim that there are audited statements available (as the law
requires). Then they back-pedal, but not until after the
misinformation is published and public.
This was cut and pasted on April 15, 2003, the same day it was
posted by head office on the SPCA's web site. "The
audited financial statements are distributed at the BC SPCA's
Annual General Meeting and are available to any member of the public
who requests a copy."
Here's what the same site says today, again cut and pasted
directly from Tall Tails: "The financial statements are
distributed at the BC SPCA's Annual General Meeting and are
available to any member of the public who requests a copy."
http://www.spca.bc.ca/TallTails/
AGM Summary
Posted on 4/28/2003 at 07:50:34 AM
by aa
"Business Arising from the Minutes" was on the Agenda. Hard to
comment on that one because there wasn't any information in the
Minutes.
A big item on the Agenda was the vote on some proposed amendments
to the Bylaws. Each amendment was approved and accepted by a
majority. In some cases, all eligible voters accepted the change
unanimously. For example, some "housekeeping" changes to correct
typos. And some "transitional wording" that removed sentences and
phrases that only applied to the 2001-2002 changeover and would no
longer be applicable.
The larger issues which dealt with the Election of Directors and
Filling Casual Vacancies, were also approved but not unanimously.
Two voters were opposed to the amendments.
Doug B did a nice job on his presentation which reviewed the past
year. He revealed many things that were "in the works" that I
didn't even know we were involved in.
BIG NEWS!! NO FINANCIALS WERE
PROVIDED! Nothing! Not consolidated, not audited, not UNaudited.
Nothing! I was so shocked and I find this totally
unacceptable. I fully understand that it must have been extremely
difficult to get all of the branches to submit their financials. I
can appreciate that our CFO recently resigned. (Did he know
something?). How can the new Board of Directors manage when they
don't have financials to work from?
Now, about the new Directors and their newly appointed positions.
Rick Sargent is the new President!!! I believe Howard Grey has
replaced Randy Reynolds as the Treasurer.
The Question Period was left to the very end. Surprisingly, there
were only a couple of people who asked anything. I was expecting a
stampede to the microphone!
Overall, it was a small AGM. Not even 1/2 the numbers that were in
attendance last year.
What Happened To
Price, Waterhouse,Coopers' Audit...
Posted on 4/28/2003 at 11:37:32 AM
by Heather
which Kim Capri told Mike Stephen [see posting further down the
board]had been completed and would be presented at the AGM?
Re(1): What Happened To Price,
Waterhouse,Coopers' Audit...
Posted on 4/28/2003 at 11:54:28 AM
by mike
I received the following from Kim Capri this morning (Monday -
April 28)
"I am writing to you to correct an
error. When I last corresponded with you, I reported that our
financial statements would be shared at the Annual General
Meeting. I learned, during the Treasurer's Report at the AGM, that
we had been advised by our auditors that we had more work to do
and they recommended not sharing the statements at this time. Our
Treasurer did state that as soon as they were ready, they would be
shared with the Membership at a General Meeting and then would be
posted on the BC SPCA website.I apologize and regret reporting
incorrectly to you. "
While I appreciate the fact that Kim passed this along to me I
find it absolutely bizarre,astonishing and disgraceful that the
COO of the BC SPCA wasn't informed of this and had to wait until
the actual AGM of the Society to find out that there are no
financial statements of any kind to be presented at the AGM
itself. Is this being accountable? It is a damn funny way of
showing it. No wonder people are questioning whether they should
donate to the SPCA. Here it is almost 4 months, one third of a
year later and they don't know how much money came in and how much
money was spent in 2002!
Mike
Stephen
Mike Stephen posted a message
"Further reply from Kim Capri" in the audit thread, saying that
Capri had told him that the financial statements for 2002 had
been audited by Price, Waterhouse, Coopers and that they would
be presented at the AGM. As you have probably heard, no
financial statements of any kind were presented at Saturday's
AGM! When CFO Bill Avery announced his resignation a few weeks
ago, he stated that he would remain in the job until after the
audit was completed. If that audit was completed, why wasn't
it presented at the AGM?
Kim Capri also told Mike that the
2001 statements had been audited as well, but she didn't know
the name of the company. I attended the 2002 AGM and the 2001
statements presented were unaudited. I asked Treasurer Randy
Reynolds why and he used the pre-centralization excuse that some
of the branches could not afford audits. CYA has all this on
tape. Reynolds also stated that
the BC SPCA had never filed audited statements, as required
under the PCA Act.
I'm told that there will be a couple
of interesting press releases in the next couple of days. Rick
Sargent is now President and Howard Gray is Treasurer. I hope we
may get some answers to our questions, but, as to "Where is the
money really going?" I'm afraid a better question would
be "Where has the money all gone?"
Heather Pettit
AAS comment:
at least Randy Reynolds told the truth. This is
just what AAS has been saying for years. Our government has
been ignoring this breach of the law, in fact it answers
requests to make the SPCA actually obey the law and produce
audited statements with the cold comfort that it thinks the SPCA
is a fine organization.
BCSPCA
DIRECTOR MISLEADS THE MEDIA ABOUT ITS FINANCES...
Nanaimo Times, May 1/03
Dear Sir,
To allay any misconceptions about the financial accountability of
the SPCA recently published in the Nanaimo Daily News, may I
explain that until the Society’s bylaws were revised in November
2001, all of the then 33 branches were using their own accounting
systems.
To comply with expectations of an organization as one legal
entity, the Society decided it must consolidate the systems for
the very purpose of being more accountable. This has proved to be
a monumental task.
For the first time in the Society’s history, all branches are now
using the same accounting codes
and next
year a full audit will be easily carried out.
In the meantime, our auditors PriceWaterhouseCoopers, are doing a
“review engagement”- the highest level of review other than a full
audit. It is expected to be completed and
published shortly.
In the meantime, please
be assured that the Society is doing everything it is legally
required to do. We appreciate the understanding and patience of
our supporters in this transition.
Norma LePage
Regional Director
BC SPCA
AAS comment: Dear
Ms LePage, you may not be aware, but more than a year later, there
are still no audited statements...as the law requires.
Global and Shaw TV transcripts.
Posted on 4/24/2003 at 02:41:18 AM by Maria
Global reporter Michelle Miller:
"Today's new coalition says all salaries should be made public
but as a result of the scandal they already are.( camera pans to
financial statements on the screen, showing salary ranges, not
individual salaries as we asked for)
The coalition also demands audits but the SPCA'S financial
statements are already independently audited and available to
the public. Still the demands continue."
Kim Capri on Global TV, referring to the PCA Act,:
"It definitely makes us different than other charities, but in
terms of some of the concerns around accountability, they're
completely unwarranted. We are as accountable as any charity in
BC."
"We opened our doors and said folks, we want to hear what you
think, and we received over a 1,000 submissions from members of
the community
directing us and giving us their feedback about where they
believed we should be going. and that process was the foundation
for our strategic plan. You know so to say we are an organization
that doesn't listen to communities it just baffles me."
****************************
Shaw TV:
Michelle Simick reporter:
" The SPCA on the other hand says it has heard the complaints
before but thinks they're unfounded."
Kim Capri:
"I think that we actually take additional steps to be accountable.
On our website we post things like our salary scales,
our financial statements are audited at year
end and those audit figures and our year end reports are available
to our members and actually to anybody that asks."
AAS comment: that was said to the
media more than a year ago, and there are still no audited
statements.
***********************
My comments: (Maria Sorowski)
The coalition asked to see SPCA individual salaries. If the SPCA
were under the societies act those individual salaries above
50,000. would have to be revealed. We are not asking for salary
ranges.
Since when have the SPCA had a full audit provincially? Last year
at the AGM April 2002, Randy Reynolds the treasurer revealed the
BC SPCA has never had a full audit in all the years it has
operated.
IF the SPCA says as Kim Capri revealed on Shaw TV, that these
audited statements are available to the public, where are they?
When were they audited and by what independent auditor?
I suggest everyone write the SPCA or better yet go down to head
office and demand to see them.
Maria.
Who To Phone For
Info About BC SPCA Financial Statements
Posted on 5/13/2003 at 03:58:47 PM
by Heather
Back in April 2003, I received an email from the Minister of
Agriculture, John van Dongen. Here's an excerpt:
"In your correspondence, you state that the British Columbia Society
for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals has never submitted an
audited financial statement to the Registrar of Companies, as
required by the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. Ministry staff
have inquired with officials at the Corporate and Personal
Properties Registries, Ministry of Finance, and are advised that the
Society has been diligent and is current with its financial
reporting requirements. You may obtain a copy of these documents by
contacting the Societies and Cooperatives Unit in Victoria at
250-356-7711."
I have phoned Mrs. Val Proctor at that number but I've never got
beyond her answering machine and she hasn't yet returned my calls.
As Maria mentions below, it's more than 14 days since the BC SPCA
AGM and the audited financial statements for 2002 should be on file
with Mrs. P. Please join me in asking Mrs. P. to send us copies of
the audited statements for 2001 and 2002! I'm willing to bet that
all she'll produce are statements for the former Vancouver Regional
Branch.
Re(1): 2002 Financial statements
Posted on 5/13/2003 at 04:38:40 PM
by mike
I sent an e-mail today asking for a copy of the 2002 Financial
Statements. I received a reply from Lorie Chortyk which said:
"We would be happy to supply you with a copy of the Financial
Statements as soon as Price Waterhouse Coopers finishes their
review. They will also be posted on the BC SPCA website for full
public access. The reason for the delay is that this is the
transition year of having 33 different accounting systems/codes
around the province (our old system) being merged into one
consolidated budget (our new system). This means that PWC has to
review 33 different systems at once instead of one. Beginning in
January, 2003, all of our branches have been using a common
accounting/coding system so we will be able to provide a full audit
in a very timely fashion next year. We apologize for the delay, but
it is a one-time circumstance as we move to our common accounting
system. Under the new accounting system we will be able to provide
financial information and analysis month by month, or area by area,
depending on how people want to access the information -- this was
not possible under the old system."
Re(1): 2002
financials
Posted on 5/13/2003 at 11:20:45 AM
by Heather
My husband, who's still a Life Member, wrote asking for a copy of
the 2002 financial statements and received a copy of the unaudited
2001 statement. Who do they think they're fooling! Why can't they be
honest with their members?
Animal rights groups want
money-losing SPCA audited
Vancouver Courier, January 9, 2004
By David Carrigg-Staff writer
A coalition of animal rights groups
wants the provincial government to investigate the B.C. SPCA's $10
million in losses over the past three years.
In a prepared statement, Cheryl
Rogers, spokeswoman for the B.C. Animal Welfare Coalition, said the
society's 2001 and 2002 financial statements were not audited, as is
required under the society's governing Prevention of Cruelty to
Animals Act.
Rogers also refuted a Dec. 10 claim
by the society's acting executive director, Craig Daniell, that the
B.C. SPCA receives no government funding for its cruelty
investigations, emergency rescue and other animal services.
Daniell made the claim after the
Canadian Union of Public Employees, which represents some front-line
society staff, launched a campaign asking people to donate animal food
and services to the society, but not money.
The B.C. SPCA recently laid off
several management and front-line staff members, blaming high union
wages and increased shelter costs for the society's dismal financial
performance.
CUPE, in turn, pointed to almost $1
million the society has spent in the past three years on severance
packages for ousted managers.
A former executive director of the
B.C. SPCA's Vancouver branch won an undisclosed out-of-court
settlement after he was fired. The firing followed revelations that
his salary had risen from $88,000 to $204,000 a year between 1996 and
2001, despite that branch's worsening financial situation.
After Hooper was fired, the society
launched some reforms, centralizing control of its 32 B.C. branches at
head office in Vancouver.
Doug Brimacombe, executive director
of head office, then employed a string of new managers, who were laid
off shortly after he was let go in May with no public explanation.
Daniell has since taken over as acting executive director.
Rogers said the 2001 and 2002
unaudited financial statements show the society received almost $2
million in gaming funds and $140,000 from the Ministry of Agriculture,
Food and Fisheries. The society also receives money from
municipalities for animal control and shelter work.
"Contrary to what the CEO claims,
considerable taxpayer dollars go to this organization that now reports
serious financial trouble," Rogers wrote, pointing to deficits of $2.6
million in 2001, $4.5 million in 2002 and a projected $3.5 to $4
million this year, for a $10 million deficit.
She said the group first called for
government intervention and an audit in April, a request echoed by
CUPE Dec. 3.
"Minister John van Dongen is
responsible for the SPCA legislation and to the public. Where is his
oversight of the B.C. SPCA's financial situation?"
Graham Currie, spokesman for the
Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, said the government does
not intend to intervene in the affairs of the B.C. SPCA, a private
organization.
He said the society has filed the
paperwork required under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act.
|
|