Search Site: Google 

Animal Advocates Society of BC
A COOPERATIVE OF ANIMAL-LOVERS AND ACTION-TAKERS
Charitable #887809267RR0001

 Box 114, 103-2609 Westview Drive, North Vancouver, B.C.,
Canada V7N 4N2
Tel: 604-984-8826 
 
Email us: Copy and paste our address into an email:   Office@AnimalAdvocates.com     

An all-volunteer registered charitable organization dedicated to rescuing and rehabilitating animals that official agencies will not help, getting laws passed to stop animal cruelty, and exposing the reason why there is so little help for suffering animals in B.C. from the BC SPCA.

Balm for the troubled soul...
AAS Happy Ending stories...

Home
About AAS

Dogs for adoption
Cats for adoption

Alphabetical list of pages

IT'S TIME!
The AAS Yard Dog Report
The dogs and their stories

Report neglected dogs

Print NO CHAINED DOGS petition

Email your petition

 

Women who steal dogs

Dog bylaws

Databases of breeders/sellers
Tracks puppymills, backyard breeders, home retailers, and protection-dog breeders in BC

Puppymill investigations

"Too Many Dogs"
AAS proposal for control of breeding laws

WHAT'S WRONG WITH THE BC SPCA?
AAS spent five years investigating and documenting the things that people had been complaining of for fifty years and published them in this web site
. Twice the SPCA used expensive lawyers to try to silence us.
SEE THE EVIDENCE OF WHAT IS WRONG

SEIZE AND KILL! or RESCUE AND SAVE?
TWO CASES: A COMPARISON AND OUTCOME
CASE ONE: TOPAZ CREEK DOGS: RESCUED AND SAVED BY CRESTON PAWS SOCIETY
CASE TWO: BEAVERDELL DOGS: SEIZED AND KILLED BY THE KELOWNA  BC SPCA

Fifty some odd northern mixed-breed dogs tied to trees, neglected and desocialized for years. One group in Topaz Creek BC, one in Beaverdell BC. Two remarkably similar situations, handled by two remarkably different organizations with radically different strategies and outcomes. Scientists themselves couldn't have created two better control groups.
Pictures and stories here

5d.jpg (13681 bytes)

Yard/guard dogs - should keeping dogs in yards 24/7 be banned?
Yes No
View result without voting
More information about chained dogs

"IN MEMORIAM" Remembering people who loved animals, and animals who were loved by people
Bunny-cat and her babies. No pound for them, but a safe shelter at AAS.
What's it all about Alfie?  AAS made sure it was about love.
Bernie sold into misery and then saved by AAS.
Betsey, white dog.JPG (43467 bytes) Betsey, an old dog needed us...
Cassie  this was good enough for her. Look what AAS did for her!

Braille the story of a blind pound dog

Annie  even when chained she tried to look after her pups

Boomer  made it to freedom and happiness, after being found in a ditch dragging his chain
Patches survived abandonment and rat poison
Finnigan  found tied to a tree, his collar grown into his neck, almost dead from starvation
Lucky  one of hundreds of grow- op dogs
Billy run over by his "family's" car and left to fend for himself as best he could

Copyright AAS 2000-2004


We really help animals....Read her story


Click on her picture to make a donation so that we can go on helping chained dogs like we helped her.

 THE watchdog

Read all about it if it's animal news!

Daily top stories

Return to Watch Dog "TOP STORIES" list here

 

 THE BC SPCA IGNORES THE LAW AND WON'T PRODUCE AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Return to Watch Dog "TOP STORIES" list here

 

The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, which governs the BC SPCA, states clearly that the SPCA must file AUDITED statements

Posted By: AAS
Date: Saturday, 5 June 2004, at 10:23 a.m.

Corporate duties and obligations
9 (1) The society must

(4) Within 14 days after the annual general meeting, the society must file with the Registrar of Companies

(a) in respect of the society and each of its branches, audited financial statements, each in the form of a balance sheet containing general particulars of assets and liabilities, and a statement of income and expenditure.....

At the BC SPCA Annual General Meeting in 2002, Treasurer Randy Reynolds stated that the BC SPCA had never filed audited statements.

Entreaties to government to make the SPCA obey the law are ignored.

Minister John van Dongen is responsible for the SPCA legislation and to the public. Where is his oversight of the B.C. SPCA's financial situation?

Graham Currie, spokesman for the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, said the government does not intend to intervene in the affairs of the B.C. SPCA, a private organization.

He said the society has filed the paperwork required under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act.

Read the PCA Act at...

http://www.qp.gov.bc.ca/statreg/stat/P/96372_01.htm#section5

CKNW: Animal Welfare Coalition criticizes SPCA finances and secrecy

Posted By: AAS
Date: Monday, 7 June 2004, at 5:12 a.m.

Tracy Pellizzari: A Coalition of animal welfare groups says the BC SPCA's take on its financial outlook is way off. After the Society's Annual General Meeting last week, where a 4.6 million dollar deficit was revealed, Past-President Rick Sargent expressed optimism that the SPCA's plan to turn around their financial fortunes was working. He noted a new CEO and finance manager started to get spending under control in the last six months of 2003. The BC SPCA Animal Welfare Coalition says in the first quarter of this year the SPCA is already 900,000 dollars in the hole, paving the way for what they called "another stunning deficit in 2004." While Sargent placed part of the blame on the Provincial Government for not giving the SPCA more funding, the Coalition argues the top-heavy SPCA administration and a failure to provide accurate information to the public is really to blame. BC's Management Services Minister says she needs more time to look over 28 recommendations for updating the Freedom of Information Act before she makes any decisions. Among those the Legislative Committee has called for a review of the SPCA's status. The Committee notes the SPCA is both a public body and society and yet is exempt from the Society Act and the Freedom of Information. Joyce Murray says she needs to give the matter due diligence before deciding whether to take action. Critics complain the SPCA exemptions make it difficult to review how the money-losing organization does business.

NEW: CKNW: Animal Welfare Coalition criticizes SPCA finances and secrecy
AAS -- Monday, 7 June 2004, at 5:12 a.m.
NEW: CKNW: In the wake of the 4.6 million dollar deficit revealed by the BC SPCA last week
AAS -- Monday, 7 June 2004, at 5:16 a.m.
NEW: CKNW: Only the BCSPCA could say things are getting better when it broke the 2002 record 4.5 million dollar deficit with a 4.6 million one last year
AAS -- Monday, 7 June 2004, at 5:20 a.m.
NEW: The Province: The SPCA has lost more than $10 million since 2000
AAS -- Monday, 7 June 2004, at 5:47 a.m.

The SPCA has been playing fast and loose with the words 'audited statements' for a couple of years *LINK*

Posted By: AAS
Date: Friday, 4 June 2004, at 6:26 p.m.

BC SPCA web page "Tall Tails" was edited!

The SPCA, especially its spinmistress Lorie Chortyk, has been playing fast and loose with the words audited statements for a couple of years. When asked, especially by the media, they disingenuously answer that financial statements are available to the public, leaving out the word "audited". But sometimes they actually claim that there are audited statements available (as the law requires). Then they back-pedal, but not until after the misinformation is published and public.

This was cut and pasted on April 15, 2003, the same day it was posted by head office on the SPCA's web site. "The audited financial statements are distributed at the BC SPCA's Annual General Meeting and are available to any member of the public who requests a copy."

Here's what the same site says today, again cut and pasted directly from Tall Tails: "The financial statements are distributed at the BC SPCA's Annual General Meeting and are available to any member of the public who requests a copy."

http://www.spca.bc.ca/TallTails/

AGM Summary
Posted on 4/28/2003 at 07:50:34 AM by aa

"Business Arising from the Minutes" was on the Agenda. Hard to comment on that one because there wasn't any information in the Minutes.
A big item on the Agenda was the vote on some proposed amendments to the Bylaws. Each amendment was approved and accepted by a majority. In some cases, all eligible voters accepted the change unanimously. For example, some "housekeeping" changes to correct typos. And some "transitional wording" that removed sentences and phrases that only applied to the 2001-2002 changeover and would no longer be applicable.
The larger issues which dealt with the Election of Directors and Filling Casual Vacancies, were also approved but not unanimously. Two voters were opposed to the amendments.
Doug B did a nice job on his presentation which reviewed the past year. He revealed many things that were "in the works" that I didn't even know we were involved in.
BIG NEWS!! NO FINANCIALS WERE PROVIDED! Nothing! Not consolidated, not audited, not UNaudited. Nothing! I was so shocked and I find this totally unacceptable. I fully understand that it must have been extremely difficult to get all of the branches to submit their financials. I can appreciate that our CFO recently resigned. (Did he know something?). How can the new Board of Directors manage when they don't have financials to work from?
Now, about the new Directors and their newly appointed positions. Rick Sargent is the new President!!! I believe Howard Grey has replaced Randy Reynolds as the Treasurer.
The Question Period was left to the very end. Surprisingly, there were only a couple of people who asked anything. I was expecting a stampede to the microphone!
Overall, it was a small AGM. Not even 1/2 the numbers that were in attendance last year.
What Happened To Price, Waterhouse,Coopers' Audit...
Posted on 4/28/2003 at 11:37:32 AM by Heather

which Kim Capri told Mike Stephen [see posting further down the board]had been completed and would be presented at the AGM?

Re(1): What Happened To Price, Waterhouse,Coopers' Audit...
Posted on 4/28/2003 at 11:54:28 AM by mike

I received the following from Kim Capri this morning (Monday - April 28)
 
"I am writing to you to correct an error. When I last corresponded with you, I reported that our financial statements would be shared at the Annual General Meeting. I learned, during the Treasurer's Report at the AGM, that we had been advised by our auditors that we had more work to do and they recommended not sharing the statements at this time. Our Treasurer did state that as soon as they were ready, they would be shared with the Membership at a General Meeting and then would be posted on the BC SPCA website.I apologize and regret reporting incorrectly to you. "

While I appreciate the fact that Kim passed this along to me I find it absolutely bizarre,astonishing and disgraceful that the COO of the BC SPCA wasn't informed of this and had to wait until the actual AGM of the Society to find out that there are no financial statements of any kind to be presented at the AGM itself.  Is this being accountable? It is a damn funny way of showing it. No wonder people are questioning whether they should donate to the SPCA. Here it is almost 4 months, one third of a year later and they don't know how much money came in and how much money was spent in 2002!
Mike Stephen
 
Mike Stephen posted a message "Further reply from Kim Capri" in the audit thread, saying that Capri had told him that the financial statements for 2002 had been audited by Price, Waterhouse, Coopers and that they would be presented at the AGM. As you have probably heard, no financial statements of any kind were presented at Saturday's AGM! When  CFO Bill Avery announced his resignation a few weeks ago, he stated that he would remain in the job until after the audit was completed. If that audit was completed, why wasn't it presented at the AGM? 
 Kim Capri also told Mike that the 2001 statements had been audited as well, but she didn't know the name of the company. I attended the 2002 AGM and the 2001 statements presented were unaudited. I asked Treasurer Randy Reynolds why and he used the pre-centralization excuse that some of the branches could not afford audits. CYA has all this on tape. Reynolds also stated that the BC SPCA had never filed audited statements, as required under the PCA Act.
I'm told that there will be a couple of interesting press releases in the next couple of days. Rick Sargent is now President and Howard Gray is Treasurer. I hope we may get some answers to our questions, but, as to "Where is the money really going?" I'm afraid a better question would be "Where has the money all gone?"
Heather Pettit
 
AAS comment: at least Randy Reynolds told the truth.  This is just what AAS has been saying for years.  Our government has been ignoring this breach of the law, in fact it answers requests to make the SPCA actually obey the law and produce audited statements with the cold comfort that it thinks the SPCA is a fine organization.
 
BCSPCA DIRECTOR MISLEADS THE MEDIA ABOUT ITS FINANCES...
Nanaimo Times, May 1/03

Dear Sir,

To allay any misconceptions about the financial accountability of the SPCA recently published in the Nanaimo Daily News, may I explain that until the Society’s bylaws were revised in November 2001, all of the then 33 branches were using their own accounting systems.

To comply with expectations of an organization as one legal entity, the Society decided it must consolidate the systems for the very purpose of being more accountable. This has proved to be a monumental task.

For the first time in the Society’s history, all branches are now using the same accounting codes
and next year a full audit will be easily carried out. In the meantime, our auditors PriceWaterhouseCoopers, are doing a “review engagement”- the highest level of review other than a full audit. It is expected to be completed and published shortly.

In the meantime, please be assured that the Society is doing everything it is legally required to do. We appreciate the understanding and patience of our supporters in this transition.

Norma LePage
Regional Director
BC SPCA

AAS comment: Dear Ms LePage, you may not be aware, but more than a year later, there are still no audited statements...as the law requires.

Global and Shaw TV transcripts.
Posted on 4/24/2003 at 02:41:18 AM by Maria

Global reporter Michelle Miller:
"Today's new coalition says all salaries should be made public but as a result of the scandal they already are.( camera pans to financial statements on the screen, showing salary ranges, not individual salaries as we asked for)
The coalition also demands audits but the SPCA'S financial statements are already independently audited and available to the public. Still the demands continue."


Kim Capri on Global TV, referring to the PCA Act,:
"It definitely makes us different than other charities, but in terms of some of the concerns around accountability, they're completely unwarranted. We are as accountable as any charity in BC."
 
"We opened our doors and said folks, we want to hear what you think, and we received over a 1,000 submissions from members of the community
directing us and giving us their feedback about where they believed we should be going. and that process was the foundation for our strategic plan. You know so to say we are an organization that doesn't listen to communities it just baffles me."
****************************
Shaw TV:
Michelle Simick reporter:
" The SPCA on the other hand says it has heard the complaints before but thinks they're unfounded."

Kim Capri:
"I think that we actually take additional steps to be accountable. On our website we post things like our salary scales, our financial statements are audited at year end and those audit figures and our year end reports are available to our members and actually to anybody that asks."
 
AAS comment: that was said to the media more than a year ago, and there are still no audited statements.
***********************

My comments: (Maria Sorowski)
The coalition asked to see SPCA individual salaries. If the SPCA were under the societies act those individual salaries above 50,000. would have to be revealed. We are not asking for salary ranges.
Since when have the SPCA had a full audit provincially? Last year at the AGM April 2002, Randy Reynolds the treasurer revealed the BC SPCA has never had a full audit in all the years it has operated.
IF the SPCA says as Kim Capri revealed on Shaw TV, that these audited statements are available to the public, where are they?
When were they audited and by what independent auditor?
I suggest everyone write the SPCA or better yet go down to head office and demand to see them.
 
Maria.
Who To Phone For Info About BC SPCA Financial Statements
Posted on 5/13/2003 at 03:58:47 PM by Heather

Back in April 2003, I received an email from the Minister of Agriculture, John van Dongen. Here's an excerpt:

"In your correspondence, you state that the British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals has never submitted an audited financial statement to the Registrar of Companies, as required by the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. Ministry staff have inquired with officials at the Corporate and Personal Properties Registries, Ministry of Finance, and are advised that the Society has been diligent and is current with its financial reporting requirements. You may obtain a copy of these documents by contacting the Societies and Cooperatives Unit in Victoria at 250-356-7711."

I have phoned Mrs. Val Proctor at that number but I've never got beyond her answering machine and she hasn't yet returned my calls. As Maria mentions below, it's more than 14 days since the BC SPCA AGM and the audited financial statements for 2002 should be on file with Mrs. P. Please join me in asking Mrs. P. to send us copies of the audited statements for 2001 and 2002! I'm willing to bet that all she'll produce are statements for the former Vancouver Regional Branch.
 
Re(1): 2002 Financial statements
Posted on 5/13/2003 at 04:38:40 PM by mike

I sent an e-mail today asking for a copy of the 2002 Financial Statements. I received a reply from Lorie Chortyk which said:
"We would be happy to supply you with a copy of the Financial Statements as soon as Price Waterhouse Coopers finishes their review. They will also be posted on the BC SPCA website for full public access. The reason for the delay is that this is the transition year of having 33 different accounting systems/codes around the province (our old system) being merged into one consolidated budget (our new system). This means that PWC has to review 33 different systems at once instead of one. Beginning in January, 2003, all of our branches have been using a common accounting/coding system so we will be able to provide a full audit in a very timely fashion next year. We apologize for the delay, but it is a one-time circumstance as we move to our common accounting system. Under the new accounting system we will be able to provide financial information and analysis month by month, or area by area, depending on how people want to access the information -- this was not possible under the old system."
 
Re(1): 2002 financials
Posted on 5/13/2003 at 11:20:45 AM by Heather

My husband, who's still a Life Member, wrote asking for a copy of the 2002 financial statements and received a copy of the unaudited 2001 statement. Who do they think they're fooling! Why can't they be honest with their members?
 

Animal rights groups want money-losing SPCA audited

Vancouver Courier, January 9, 2004

By David Carrigg-Staff writer

A coalition of animal rights groups wants the provincial government to investigate the B.C. SPCA's $10 million in losses over the past three years.

In a prepared statement, Cheryl Rogers, spokeswoman for the B.C. Animal Welfare Coalition, said the society's 2001 and 2002 financial statements were not audited, as is required under the society's governing Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act.

Rogers also refuted a Dec. 10 claim by the society's acting executive director, Craig Daniell, that the B.C. SPCA receives no government funding for its cruelty investigations, emergency rescue and other animal services.

Daniell made the claim after the Canadian Union of Public Employees, which represents some front-line society staff, launched a campaign asking people to donate animal food and services to the society, but not money.

The B.C. SPCA recently laid off several management and front-line staff members, blaming high union wages and increased shelter costs for the society's dismal financial performance.

CUPE, in turn, pointed to almost $1 million the society has spent in the past three years on severance packages for ousted managers.

A former executive director of the B.C. SPCA's Vancouver branch won an undisclosed out-of-court settlement after he was fired. The firing followed revelations that his salary had risen from $88,000 to $204,000 a year between 1996 and 2001, despite that branch's worsening financial situation.

After Hooper was fired, the society launched some reforms, centralizing control of its 32 B.C. branches at head office in Vancouver.

Doug Brimacombe, executive director of head office, then employed a string of new managers, who were laid off shortly after he was let go in May with no public explanation. Daniell has since taken over as acting executive director.

Rogers said the 2001 and 2002 unaudited financial statements show the society received almost $2 million in gaming funds and $140,000 from the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Fisheries. The society also receives money from municipalities for animal control and shelter work.

"Contrary to what the CEO claims, considerable taxpayer dollars go to this organization that now reports serious financial trouble," Rogers wrote, pointing to deficits of $2.6 million in 2001, $4.5 million in 2002 and a projected $3.5 to $4 million this year, for a $10 million deficit.

She said the group first called for government intervention and an audit in April, a request echoed by CUPE Dec. 3.

"Minister John van Dongen is responsible for the SPCA legislation and to the public. Where is his oversight of the B.C. SPCA's financial situation?"

Graham Currie, spokesman for the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, said the government does not intend to intervene in the affairs of the B.C. SPCA, a private organization.

He said the society has filed the paperwork required under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act.