Animal Advocates Watchdog

MOSCOW: The State Duma has finally agreed that Russia needs "humane traps."

http://en.rian.ru/analysis/20080414/105009898.html

Fur from 'humane trap'

14/04/2008 14:54 MOSCOW. (RIA Novosti commentator Tatyana Sinitsyna) - The State Duma has finally agreed that Russia needs "humane traps."

This combination sounds oxymoronic but reflects progressive change. Old traps, which catch a fur animal by the feet, have been used for the last 60 years. They are truly barbaric - the animals die a long and agonizing death. What is offered instead? Also death, but it will be instant - a better choice for any living being in a fatal situation.

The Duma-approved bill on ratifying the agreement on international humane trapping standards affecting 19 species of wild animals must be approved by the Federation Council and the president. The European Union and Canada have been waiting for Russia's decision for a decade now. The three sides signed it in April 1998, but it cannot come into force until every side completes the required legal procedures.

The Duma rejected the agreement initially because it means a considerable increase in expenses for hunters. Later on, Deputy Minister of Agriculture Vladimir Izmailov demonstrated to the MPs a tiny "humane trap" (weighing 400 grams). He explained that hunters will not have to pay too much - factory price will be a mere 170 rubles (a little over $7). Moreover, the re-equipment process will take from four to eight years.

Russia is a major fur producer. It supplies the foreign markets with its monopoly sable. Up to 400,000 sables a year are caught in the old traps. Thirty other species, mostly birds (nutcrackers, jays and tits) are trapped for every sable that is caught. But apart from that, traps kill a big number of rare birds, registered as endangered species.

Sometimes other animals get caught, for instance, Far Eastern leopards. Experts believe there are only 40 of them left, and each death is a tragic step toward their extinction. The agreement lays emphasis on the need to minimize such cases.

Canada and the United States have been using "humane traps" for more than 80 years. Russian experts have considerably improved them and received a Canadian certificate. It is possible to start mass producing them any time. But the current picture remains sad.

Yevgeny Kuznetsov, a leading associate of the Center for the Protection of Wild Animals said: "We have studied 56 Red Books, 31 of which mention 17 species caught in the old traps. An estimated number of night and day birds of prey caught in traps every year is over 300,000. Most often, these traps snap golden eagles, white-tailed sea eagles, northern falcons, black vultures, and eagle and snow owls, some of which are endangered species. "Humane traps" are practically fail-safe, which is very important for hunters, and are not likely to snap non-profile species."

Damage from the death of trapped non-profile and rare species has legal and financial aspects. Legally it is comparable to illegal destruction of flora and fauna. In material terms, this damage runs into as much as 2 billion rubles per year. This is double the profit which Russia is getting from sable exports.

What sanctions may be imposed on Russia if it does not ratify the agreement? Kuznetsov gave this answer: "In this case the document will cease to exist and the tough 1991 EU regulations will come into force. Russian fur will be totally barred from the market - no sable or any other fur will be allowed. We will not be able to sell fur even through third countries. America has enough of its own fur, and China is not yet ready for massive purchases of such a luxury product as sable."

Kuznetsov believes that in the worst case, sable hunting will simply be discontinued in a number of years.

This will contribute to the protection of wild animals. And what about those for whom hunting is a means of survival? It is possible to sell sable at home. One MP called for buying sable coats for Russian women. But domestic prices will be so much lower that this patriotic solution will be economically pointless.

It would be great to impose a complete ban on hunting as an inhumane and atavistic endeavor in our age of nanotechnology and space research. But for the time being only India can be proud of having done this. However, even one humane step brings us closer to this goal.

The opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not necessarily represent those of RIA Novosti.

Share