Animal Advocates Watchdog

Re: One way to relieve distress is to kill the distressed *LINK* *PIC*

'In spite of a rescuers' animals being far happier than animals in SPCA madness-producing cells and cages, if there is any illness, even if being treated, the SPCA can and has stormed in with RCMP and seized the animals, killing many of those happy animals.'

The most egregious example of this is how the SPCA seized Gwen Wilson's happy cats and her happy dog. The link to the whole sordid story of how the SPCA then killed all or most of the cats and made Gwen pay approximately $4,000 to get her dog out of an SPCA cell where he had become sadly depressed, is below.

Citizens of Hope, who knew that Gwen was a kind, decent person who for years had given up all but the bare necessities of life to properly care for her rescued animals, including vet care, expressed their outrage in the media, and raised the funds to get Dakota out of the SPCA before they killed him too. Much of the outrage centred around the well-known fact that people dropped their cats at Gwen's because the Chilliwack SPCA killed so many cats and charged $50 if they surrendered their unwanted cat to be killed. Gwen was saving cats from the SPCA, but in the end the SPCA got them and killed them anyway.

The SPCA could have damage control by offering to help Gwen with her expenses, but instead it chose to defame her in the media by intimating that she was a mentally ill hoarder.

And then it stepped up the punishment of this kind person and the justification of what it did, by having cruelty charges laid against her even while it knew that she had cancer. The Act doesn't say the SPCA must have charges laid; it didn't have to do this to Gwen. Gwen died a convicted animal abuser.

This is one of the saddest and most enraging cases of the SPCA's abuse of statutory powers and cruelty to animals and people that AAS has been involved with. In memory of Gwen, and all the other SPCA victims, I will carry on the fight to make the SPCA accountable.

Gwen and a friend are greeted by her remaining pets. The cats who used to rush to greet her are probably dead by this time. One of the dogs is Dakota, seized by the SPCA at the time it seized the cats, on the grounds that he had a small sore on his leg. It cost almost $4000 to get Dakota out of the SPCA before it killed or sold him.

Messages In This Thread

Maple Ridge SPCA buck provincial trend
Is any SPCA no-kill?
The SPCA's list of 56 reasons it can kill for while saying it doesn't kill except to end the suffering of an animal that is 'beyond medical help'
I currently have a cat hanging around my house who meets #21, #13, #25 and #55 on the SPCA's list of 56 reasons to euthanize
SPCA: #27 - Head trauma and/or #38 - Neurological problems and consequently require #18 - Behavior assessment!
I rescued a mother cat and her 3 beautiful kittens and turned them over ...
Experiences at the NFLD SPCA raises questions
If someone is going to kill them, should that agency be an animal welfare society?
Simple: just be honest and soon there will be nothing to criticize and no more critics to threaten to sue
Why are fewer animals being left at SPCA 'shelters'?
People are trusting the alternatives to the SPCA
Action for Animals in Distress "takes senior cats from shelters like the SPCA where they would normally be euthanized"
Bad personal experiences means more people trust the alternatives to the SPCA
My experience with most of the staff all those years is that they were uncaring and even rude and arrogant
Hard to choose my favourite reason to kill on the SPCA's list
If goverment had a list like this for humans, think of the money that would be saved
Same old, same old: #17 'Excessive vocalization'
What reasons on the '56 Reasons' list did the SPCA use to kill Richmond resident Michael Carich's cats? *LINK*
#11 'Declared dangerous' - Raymond's video
This is why some SPCA staff are still stealing animals from SPCAs
I think the public deserves to know so it can decide who to donate to based on true facts
Faith destroyed
Where I live there is a humane society that is the same as your SPCA
One way to relieve distress is to kill the distressed
Re: One way to relieve distress is to kill the distressed *LINK* *PIC*
Please honour Gwen by reading her story *LINK* *PIC*
Do the SPCA fine words match its actions?
Not the case for small animals
How many of the SPCA's reasons are reasonable?
L.A.: Settlement Sets Stricter Rules for Animal Killing at Shelters *LINK*
Shamefully, animal advocates in BC will have to make the BC SPCA limit the reasons it can kill
"Our limited resources are better used in caring for animals than in litigation,"

Share