Animal Advocates Watchdog

We cannot conceive of a reason for silencing anyone who is being investigated that is in the public good

A scrutiny of the BC SPCA by an outside authority is long overdue. Animal welfarists and rescuers have been sounding the alarm for decades.

By sealing lips, the SPCA suppresses public scrutiny.

What possible purpose can a law enforcement agency have for silencing anyone it is investigating? We cannot conceive of a reason that is in the public good.

The SPCA has been protected from scrutiny, even through Freedom of Information. It takes in $20 million a year and does not have to say exactly what it does with it. It has enormous powers under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and it is - so far - not being asked any hard questions by government. And CEO Craig Daniell wants even more powers.

How the SPCA is using its powers must be investigated. AAS knows of so many seizures of healthy animals that are then either returned to their owners if its huge "seizure costs" are paid, or sold if they can't be paid. We know of many cases where seized healthy animals have been made sick by SPCA neglect, even have died of SPCA neglect. We hear this, not only from distraught owners, but from lawyers and vets too.

It is using its enormous powers to terrify rescue organizations, most famously, by its raid on Forgotten Felines Cat Shelter, where the shelter was actually being given cats by an SPCA branch that were scheduled to be killed. This is a portent of worse to come in our opinion, if the SPCA's power is not more carefully defined and if there continues to be no independant oversight.
http://www.animaladvocates.com/Watchdog/ForgottenFelines.htm

AAS has been asking, and will continue to ask, the government of BC, to investigate the SPCA.

Messages In This Thread

SECRET SEIZURES! The SPCA seizes 28 Pit bulls *LINK* *PIC*
More photos.... *NM* *LINK*
The gag order.... *NM* *LINK*
We cannot conceive of a reason for silencing anyone who is being investigated that is in the public good
The BC SPCA uses its intimidating and unregulated powers to silence animal owners and critics
If you are concerned at the SPCA's power and lack of recourse for victims, write these Ministers:
Is this even legal?
No it's not!
I came back a few hours later with the cash and they had killed the cat!!
This is a story that AAS has heard many times for more than ten years
So you are upset about the cat. Well do something about it
Gag orders aren't recognized in court
The infamous McLibel case - 'the biggest corporate PR disaster in history'
The SPCA is not compelled to return animals, even if the SPCA's costs are paid
The steps taken by the BCSPCA throughout this drama seem bizarre to me *LINK* *PIC*

Share