Animal Advocates Watchdog

The by-law, as it stands, is confusing and far from adequate

I am happy to see that the city of Burnaby is actually thinking of the welfare of dogs within it's jurisdiction.
I am even more thankful that Councillor Colleen Jordan recognized that the proposed by-lay was far from complete, and is asking for more information.
The by-law, as it stands, is confusing and far from adequate.
It is not clear if "unattended" means that the person is in the home or office next to the dog, or nowhere in the vicinity,
It's not clear if a dog may be tethered 24/7 as long as there is someone in the vicinity.
Also, I don't want formerly tethered dogs to be untethered but left alone in a yard, left in a crate, pen, garage, or locked up in alone in the basement.
The by-law must go a lot further, and to be truly effective, much public education needs to be done re: the physical and psychological needs of dogs.
And the penalties for abuse abd neglect of dogs must be strict, and they must be enforced.
If these dogs are merely pushed further out of sight, the problems merely increase.

Messages In This Thread

Burnaby's anti-tethering bylaw: AAS presents its report *LINK* *PIC*
Burnaby Now: An animal advocacy group has made Burnaby city council rethink its proposed dog-tethering bylaw
We agree with Mayor Corrigan
Letter to Council: Thank you for understanding that an anti-tethering bylaw is only one piece of a very complicated puzzle
Warrant Obtained on Psychological Abuse
We hope that the SPCA will confirm to Burnaby council and staff that the AAS report is accurate and will join us
The by-law, as it stands, is confusing and far from adequate
A Matter of Public Enthusiasm: a point of view by Ali Yazman *LINK* *PIC*

Share