Animal Advocates Watchdog

Mixed message is illogical

Paul Watson, to me, anyway, doesn't see that by the aquarium existing, it legitimizes all the other things he is fighting - all the ways humans "use" sea animals. If the aquarium wound down, and ended, and that let everyone know why it is wrong to keep those animals in captivity, maybe, people would understand why they must not be slaughtered into extinction as well.

Messages In This Thread

Paul Watson justifies animal captivity
Mixed message is illogical
Watson's logic ends in only one bleak place: The confinement and control of all ocean species, for food, or for fun
See what we mean? Geoduck farms
Annelise Sorg has not got it quite right.
What a letdown...
It's unbelievable what people will believe is true
Re: It's unbelievable what people will believe is true
Watson has been used by the Vancouver Aquarium as their token "environmentalist" for the last decade
I would say that Paul has been mis-quoted
If it is untrue, I see it as putting the lie to the Vancouver Aquarium itself

Share