Animal Advocates Watchdog

I would say that Paul has been mis-quoted

I think it is not so much a matter of justifying the captivity of whales that Paul supposedly told the Vancouver Sun, but more than it's a matter of what to do what's right for the Orca's and Dolphin's well-being, now that they are in these pools. Paul just wants the V.A. to at least make the animals stay as pleasnt as they can and should. Paul is a dedicated person and would risk his own life to save just one animal from harm, so I find it hard to believe that he is in favour of animals in captivity. I would say that Paul has been mis-quoted and some of his statements taken out of context by the reporter because this is what most newspapers do.

Messages In This Thread

Paul Watson justifies animal captivity
Mixed message is illogical
Watson's logic ends in only one bleak place: The confinement and control of all ocean species, for food, or for fun
See what we mean? Geoduck farms
Annelise Sorg has not got it quite right.
What a letdown...
It's unbelievable what people will believe is true
Re: It's unbelievable what people will believe is true
Watson has been used by the Vancouver Aquarium as their token "environmentalist" for the last decade
I would say that Paul has been mis-quoted
If it is untrue, I see it as putting the lie to the Vancouver Aquarium itself

Share