Animal Advocates Watchdog

The SPCA's list of 56 reasons it can kill for while saying it doesn't kill except to end the suffering of an animal that is 'beyond medical help'
In Response To: Is any SPCA no-kill? ()

February 13, 2008, BC SPCA CEO Craig Daniell wrote in the Vancouver Sun, 'When the SPCA must euthanize an animal, it is for the same reason so-called "no-kill" facilities euthanize animals — to end the suffering of an animal that is beyond medical help.'

Here is the list of reasons that staff put into the SPCA's system when animals are killed.

1. Aggression-humans
2. Aggression to humans
3. Behavioural
4. Blind
5. Cat flu
6. Compulsive, obsessive, stereotypic behaviour
7. Congenital defects
8. Contagious
9. Critical distress
10. Deaf
11. Declared dangerous
12. Dental disease
13. Dominance aggression
14. Dominant behaviour
15. Ear mites
16. Escape behaviour
17. Excessive vocalization
18. Failed BA (behaviour assessment)
19. Fearful/aggressive
20. Feline leukemia
21. Feral
22. FIV positive
23. Guarding behaviour
24. Hair loss-demodex
25. Hair loss-non specific
26. Hair loss-ring worm
27. Head trauma
28. Heartworm positive
29. Humane grounds
30. Hyper reactivity to stimuli
31. Hyperactive
32. Idiopathic aggression
33. Injured
34. Kennel cough
35. Kennel crazy
36. Lack of pigmentation
37. Litter box aversion
38. Neurological problems
39. Old
40. Orthopedic problems
41. Owner request
42. Parvo
43. Parvo contact
44. Poor condition
45. Seizures
46. Separation anxiety
47. Sick
48. Spraying stress
49. Tick paralysis
50. Timid/fearful with accompanying anxiety
51. Too many cats
52. Too many dogs
53. Too young
54. Trauma
55. Unsocial
56. Wolf hybrid

Messages In This Thread

Maple Ridge SPCA buck provincial trend
Is any SPCA no-kill?
The SPCA's list of 56 reasons it can kill for while saying it doesn't kill except to end the suffering of an animal that is 'beyond medical help'
I currently have a cat hanging around my house who meets #21, #13, #25 and #55 on the SPCA's list of 56 reasons to euthanize
SPCA: #27 - Head trauma and/or #38 - Neurological problems and consequently require #18 - Behavior assessment!
I rescued a mother cat and her 3 beautiful kittens and turned them over ...
Experiences at the NFLD SPCA raises questions
If someone is going to kill them, should that agency be an animal welfare society?
Simple: just be honest and soon there will be nothing to criticize and no more critics to threaten to sue
Why are fewer animals being left at SPCA 'shelters'?
People are trusting the alternatives to the SPCA
Action for Animals in Distress "takes senior cats from shelters like the SPCA where they would normally be euthanized"
Bad personal experiences means more people trust the alternatives to the SPCA
My experience with most of the staff all those years is that they were uncaring and even rude and arrogant
Hard to choose my favourite reason to kill on the SPCA's list
If goverment had a list like this for humans, think of the money that would be saved
Same old, same old: #17 'Excessive vocalization'
What reasons on the '56 Reasons' list did the SPCA use to kill Richmond resident Michael Carich's cats? *LINK*
#11 'Declared dangerous' - Raymond's video
This is why some SPCA staff are still stealing animals from SPCAs
I think the public deserves to know so it can decide who to donate to based on true facts
Faith destroyed
Where I live there is a humane society that is the same as your SPCA
One way to relieve distress is to kill the distressed
Re: One way to relieve distress is to kill the distressed *LINK* *PIC*
Please honour Gwen by reading her story *LINK* *PIC*
Do the SPCA fine words match its actions?
Not the case for small animals
How many of the SPCA's reasons are reasonable?
L.A.: Settlement Sets Stricter Rules for Animal Killing at Shelters *LINK*
Shamefully, animal advocates in BC will have to make the BC SPCA limit the reasons it can kill
"Our limited resources are better used in caring for animals than in litigation,"

Share