The poster for an August 27, 2006 crab feast planned by the Prince Rupert SPCA looked like a bizarre parody. A grinning cartoon crab, pink as if already burned, sprawled beneath a beach umbrella. “Live crab, cooked to eat at the park or cooked to take home,” the poster advertised. A photo of a real crab affirmed that real animals were really to be boiled--until on August 17 the parent British Columbia SPCA cancelled the event under pressure personally directed by Sea Shepherd Conservation Society founder Paul Watson. Watson then pledged to personally make a donation and urged others to donate to the BC/SPCA.
Though the crab feast was averted, the episode raised issues of posture and strategy which should be of pre-eminent concern to every humane organization.
“Our mission,” the Prince Rupert SPCA web site predictably proclaims, is “the prevention of cruelty to animals, and promotion of animal welfare.”
Boiling animals to death, as the Prince Rupert SPCA learned, is perceived as cruel not only by long-established consensus of the humane community, but also by much of the public. Promoting animal welfare, by any reasonable definition, includes avoiding acts which may be construed as either endorsing or participating in cruelty, such as boiling crabs to raise funds.
The Prince Rupert SPCA tried briefly to defend itself by citing the February 2005 conclusion of researchers funded by the Norwegian government that crustaceans such as crabs and lobsters do not feel pain when boiled. But the Norwegian government also defends whaling and sealing, against the weight of world opinion.
Researchers with ties to the Maine lobster industry have comparably defended boiling crabs and lobsters. But these positions scarcely represent the prevailing scientific perspective, recently summarized in the Advocates for Animals publication Cephalopods & Decapod Crustaceans: Their Capacity To Experience Pain & Suffering (10 Queensferry Street, Edinburgh, EH2 4PG, Scotland, U.K.).
Further, no matter what anyone in a white lab coat may contend, the simple, obvious, self-evident conclusion of most people who see crabs or lobsters trying to crawl out of boiling water is that these animals are being tortured to death.
As far back as 1952, delegates from 25 nations agreed at a convention hosted by the World Federation for the Protection of Animals that boiling live crustaceans sets a bad example of how animals should be treated, and should be abolished.
As recently as August 10, two members of Animal Rights Croatia locked themselves into a fish tank to dramatize the plight of boiled lobsters.
The grocery chain Whole Foods earlier in 2006 quit selling live soft-shelled crabs and lobsters, in recognition that some practices, even if legal and no matter how lucrative, are too cruel for an enlightened and responsible business to perpetuate.
Unfortunately, the proposed Prince Rupert SPCA crab feast was not unprecedented. Animal Advocates Society of British Columbia founder Judy Stone pointed out that the Prince Rupert SPCA held a crab feast in 2005.
The Prince Rupert SPCA is among the 32 branches of the British Columbia SPCA, a $20 million a year operation that serves more territory than any other hands-on humane society in North America. Long intensely critical of the BC/SPCA for many reasons, Stone has since 2001 fought BC/SPCA efforts to purge her web site, of some of the content. Many of Stone’s objections pertain to practices and policies which remain common among humane societies that hold animal control contracts. Some of her web site concerns methods that were abandoned under pressure more than 20 years ago.
But Stone was up to date and on message in pointing out that a humane society that allows animals to be boiled alive as a fundraiser clearly has diminished moral authority to speak out against other abuses.
ANIMAL PEOPLE learned through extensive web and file searching that the Prince Rupert SPCA may not have been completely alone in promoting live boiling. Oysters are also typically cooked or eaten alive. The Humane Society of Harford County, Maryland, holds an annual “Bull n’ Oyster Roast.” The most recent was on April 28, 2006. IRS Form 990 indicates that Humane Society of Harford County “special events” net about $27,000 of an annual budget of almost $700,000, about half of which comes from animal control contracts.
The live boiling issue can be linked to the larger issue of humane societies serving meat at public functions, a practice that ANIMAL PEOPLE has editorially denounced since inception in 1992, and the lack of humane attention to the suffering of fish.
The September 1994 ANIMAL PEOPLE editorial “Table manners” still applies:
Excluding meat from humane events is no more than asking participants to adhere to the rules of the house, on a par with asking church-goers to refrain from spitting and swearing during sermons or asking bar-goers to wear shirts and shoes. What people choose to put in their mouths in their own homes may be their business, but at a humane event, it's our business--and if we don't make the effort to separate ourselves from the meat habit, we really can't expect the public to see us as the principled people we presume to be.
What about fish?
If someone jabbed a hook through the roof of a cat or dog's mouth, dragged her on the end of a rope, and then either bludgeoned or drowned her, most of us would immediately seek cruelty charges.
If someone threw nets over cats or dogs and drowned them by the million, presumably to eat, but threw away half the victims as inedible, the hue and cry might reach Alpha Centauri, Fish are cold-blooded, and mostly not as intelligent as mammals (despite some noteworthy exceptions), but their central nervous systems are every bit as keenly developed. Thus their capacity to suffer is every bit as acute. That should be reason enough to not eat fish.
At that time, meat and fish were still served at most major humane conferences. That changed after the No Kill Conferences, 1995-2001, and No More Homeless Pets conferences, 2000-2005, excluded flesh while attracting more participants than all but one of the traditional humane conferences. That one, the annual Expo hosted by the Humane Society of the U.S., went vegetarian after HSUS president Wayne Pacelle introduced a pro-vegan food policy in January 2005.
Any humane society participation in animal killing for human consumption is inappropriate and deplorable, especially in view of the increasingly well-recognized suffering involved in every phase of raising, transporting, and killing poultry and hooved livestock, plus the reality that the human appetite for fish drives the Atlantic Canada and Namibian seal hunts and Japanese and Norwegian whaling.
Yet actively participating in either a “crab feast” or “oyster roast” goes well beyond directors merely practicing the denial typical of mainstream shoppers as they select cellophane-wrapped parts of dead animals at the supermarket. These events involve humane society representatives in deliberately doing things to living animals which in most North American jurisdictions would be crimes and might be felonies if done to a dog or cat.
Merritt Clifton
Editor, ANIMAL PEOPLE
P.O. Box 960
Clinton, WA 98236
Telephone: 360-579-2505
Fax: 360-579-2575
E-mail: anmlpepl@whidbey.com
Web: www.animalpeoplenews.org
[ANIMAL PEOPLE is the leading independent newspaper providing
original investigative coverage of animal protection worldwide,
founded in 1992. Our readership of 30,000-plus includes the
decision-makers at more than 10,000 animal protection organizations.
We have no alignment or affiliation with any other entity. $24/year;
for free sample, send address.]