Interesting to note that you post a story about a rival animal welfare group (SPCA) losing a case dealing with animal cruelty. No facts are provided, only that the SPCA lost its case which it obviously thought was a case of animal cruelty. Since your group claims that it only cares about "the animals" and not just to attack the SPCA- why post this obvious loss to the cause of animal cruelty? Is it possible that you do not really care about animal welfare, but are simply attacking a rival organization that does a better job than you? If not, why not attack the decision?