Animal Advocates of B.C.
A COOPERATIVE OF ANIMAL-LOVERS AND ACTION-TAKERS

Why did the SPCA stop AAS from getting laws that would more easily allow them to seize suffering animals?... Is it because the seized animal can't be immediately sold or killed?

The seized dog can't immediately be sold or killed! If the seizure is disputed the dog  must be held pending a court case to determine if the dog should or should not be returned to its owner. The seized dog eats, poops, barks, and takes up space that could be used by a dog that might sell.  A seized dog takes up space that might be needed for a pound contract dog.  Is this why the SPCA almost never does anything to prevent the kind of cruelty that we see everyday?  Is this why they stopped a definition of neglect being included in the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act?

Over a period of five years, perhaps three hundred people have phoned us to say they have begged the SPCA to help a suffering animal.  We know that this is just the tip of the iceberg.  The SPCA boasts of many thousands of "investigations" a year.  (We call them "look and leave" or "drive-bys", but they look great in print; see what we mean). It's usually a dog rotting its life away on a chain - a creature with so much love to give - even to those who abuse and neglect it; with such a great capacity to have fun; who feel and show   joy and gratitude for the smallest kindness or favour.
Annie and pups, 150, jpg.JPG (11909 bytes)   But we hear too of starving cows and horses and donkeys, and the cruelty of pet stores, and the vile conditions of puppy mills.  And almost without exception we are told that the caller has been told by the SPCA, "There's nothing we can do, the law says  as long as it's got food, water and shelter."  And then they go on to say that a tree, soon to be leafless, is adequate shelter, (see the section on shelter that AAS had adopted in 10 lower mainland municipalities - including the municipalities where the SPCA says a tree or an overhang is "adequate shelter"). And that if you're giving water to the pup that has been drinking out of feces-filled puddles, then that's okay.  And the crying pup that has been muzzled:  if it is fed and given water then there's no law being broken. And the mother dog whose chain is so tangled that she can't reach her dilapitated  doghouse to put her pups in, so they drown in the depression she has dug for a nest.

"Can't do anything - laws aren't adequate"
(but they stopped our attempt to make them better)

Why doesn't the SPCA help these thousands of animals a year?

We can tell you that animal control  (pound contracts) pay, (if they're run cheaply enough) and animal welfare costs.

And that a seized dog costs the SPCA money to hold for the 14 days given the owner to dispute the seizure before the SPCA can sell it or kill it.

Pound contracting is simple - stray dogs are collected, other dogs are surrendered.  Any strays not claimed, and all the surrendered dogs, can quickly sold or killed.  But a seized dog must be held until the case is resolved. 

The seized dog can't be instantly sold or killed! The seized dog eats, poops, barks, and takes up space that could be used by a dog that might sell.  Is this why the SPCA almost never does anything to prevent the kind of cruelty that we see everyday?  Is this why they stopped a definition of neglect from being included in the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals act?

 

Cassie, under the car.JPG (34638 bytes)
Choklit on her chain.web.jpg (30012 bytes) Horses, carcase.JPG (34885 bytes)
Snow, leashed..JPG (37052 bytes) Duct tape dog, 275 dpi.JPG (27049 bytes)
 

© 2001  
Animal Advocates Society of B.C. [Canada]

 Editor: Judith Stone