Animal Advocates Watchdog

Watson's logic ends in only one bleak place: The confinement and control of all ocean species, for food, or for fun
In Response To: Mixed message is illogical ()

Lyn MacDonald's post has gone straight to the point that Watson seems to miss. How can one be a legitimate spokesperson for maintaining the oceans as nature created them (as Watson claims to be) while defending putting any of the ocean's species into unnatural man-made facilities?

Where would Watson's logic end? We already have increasing numbers of ocean species in farms, even well inland.

Watson's logic ends in only one bleak place: The confinement and control of all ocean species, for food, or for fun.

Messages In This Thread

Paul Watson justifies animal captivity
Mixed message is illogical
Watson's logic ends in only one bleak place: The confinement and control of all ocean species, for food, or for fun
See what we mean? Geoduck farms
Annelise Sorg has not got it quite right.
What a letdown...
It's unbelievable what people will believe is true
Re: It's unbelievable what people will believe is true
Watson has been used by the Vancouver Aquarium as their token "environmentalist" for the last decade
I would say that Paul has been mis-quoted
If it is untrue, I see it as putting the lie to the Vancouver Aquarium itself

Share