Animal Advocates Watchdog

Is the Nanaimo SPCA practicing limited surrender?

Carol Plikonis, Nanaimo Pound employee writes in the Nanaimo Star, "However, when the SPCA is full, people are put on a waiting list, are referred to us or must explore other alternatives."

If this is true it means that the Nanaimo SPCA is practicing limited surrender and that is very good news. We have understood for a long time that the Nanaimo SPCA kills fewer animals than most SPCAs and this would be largely the reason, that and the fact that the Nanaimo SPCA has no dog control/disposal contracts. The Nanaimo SPCA also attracts some first-rate volunteers who move heaven and earth to find a solution other than killing. Limited surrender agencies are more attractive to good people.

"Explore other alternatives". That means putting the responsibility back where it belongs, and that is the answer to the irresponsibility of pet dumping, not making a profit from irresponsible behaviour.

Messages In This Thread

A pound by any other name is not a shelter
Does anyone care?
How true and how sad that is.
The Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act legally requires the SPCA to relieve the distress of an animal in distress and that includes stray dogs hit by cars
It's interesting that these two, a pound contractor and an SPCA, are squabbling. *LINK*
Nanaimo Pound employee justifies killing surrendered pets
Real animal lovers wouldn't put those shoes on, much less walk a dog to its death in them
Is the Nanaimo SPCA practicing limited surrender?
Limiting surrender at the Richmond Virginia SPCA. What part of this does the BC SPCA not understand? *LINK*
AAS has been saying this for years: CAMP protects the BC SPCA's dog disposal business
I do not feel sorry for anyone who takes a paycheque for killing healthy animals
Perverting logic: Lies in the pet disposal business
The greatest of all the lies that protects the pet disposal business

Share