For once I must take the side of C. Daniell.
It is clear to me, that by "so called no kill" he means they do not kill, but euthanize to end suffering when the animal is beyond medical help.

He wants to imply, that this is what the SPCA does.

However and unfortunately, the BCSPCA has shown, that in some of their shelters, some times animals are killed, where euthanization would not be necessary.

So as far as this is concerned, C. Daniell had better revise his statement, or start acting accordingly and high time it would be.