Animal Advocates Watchdog

California tethering restriction law

BILL NUMBER: SB 1578 Dogs: tethering prohibition

FEBRUARY 23, 2006

This bill, with specified exceptions, would prohibit a person from
tethering, fastening, chaining, tying, or restraining a dog to a dog
house, tree, fence, or other stationary object.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 122335) is added to
Part 6 of Division 105 of the Health and Safety Code, to read:

CHAPTER 8. Dog Tethering

(a) For purposes of this chapter, the following terms shall have the following definitions:

(1) "Animal control" means the municipal or county animal control
agency or any other entity responsible for enforcing animal-related
laws.

(2) "Agricultural operation" means an activity that is necessary
for the commercial growing and harvesting of crops or the raising of
livestock or poultry.

(3) "Person" means any individual, partnership, corporation,
organization, trade or professional association, firm, limited
liability company, joint venture, association, trust, estate, or any
other legal entity, and any officer, member, shareholder, director,
employee, agent, or representative thereof.

(4) "Reasonable period" means a period of time not to exceed three
hours in a 24-hour period, or a time that is otherwise approved by
animal control.

(b) No person shall tether, fasten, chain, tie, or restrain a dog,
or cause a dog to be tethered, fastened, chained, tied, or
restrained, to a dog house, tree, fence, or any other stationary
object.

(c) Notwithstanding subdivision (b), a person may do any of the
following in accordance with Section 597t of the Penal Code:

(1) Attach a dog to a running line, pulley, or trolley system. A
dog shall not be tethered to the running line, pulley, or trolley
system by means of a choke collar or pinch collar.

(2) Tether, fasten, chain, tie, or otherwise restrain a dog
pursuant to the requirements of a camping or recreational area.

(3) Tether, fasten, chain, or tie a dog no longer than is
necessary for the person to complete a temporary task that requires
the dog to be restrained for a reasonable period.

(4) Tether, fasten, chain, or tie a dog while engaged in, or
actively training for, an activity that is conducted pursuant to a
valid license issued by the State of California if the activity for
which the license is issued is associated with the use or presence of
a dog. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to prohibit a
person from restraining a dog while participating in activities or
using accommodations that are reasonably associated with the licensed
activity.

(5) Tether, fasten, chain, or tie a dog while actively engaged in
any of the following:

(A) Conduct that is directly related to the business of
shepherding or herding cattle or livestock.

(B) Conduct that is directly related to the business of
cultivating agricultural products, if the restraint is reasonably
necessary for the safety of the dog.

(d) A person who violates this chapter is guilty of an infraction
or a misdemeanor.

(1) An infraction under this chapter is punishable upon conviction
by a fine of up to two hundred fifty dollars ($250) as to each dog
with respect to which a violation occurs.

(2) A misdemeanor under this chapter is punishable upon conviction
by a fine of up to one thousand dollars ($1,000) as to each dog with
respect to which a violation occurs, or imprisonment in a county
jail for not more than six months, or both.

(3) Notwithstanding subdivision (d), animal control may issue a
correction warning to a person who violates this chapter, requiring
the owner to correct the violation, in lieu of an infraction or
misdemeanor, unless the violation endangers the health or safety of
the animal, the animal has been wounded as a result of the violation,
or a correction warning has previously been issued to the
individual.

(e) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prohibit a
person from walking a dog with a hand-held leash.
SEC. 2. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to
Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because
the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school
district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or
infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty
for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the
Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the
meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California
Constitution.

Messages In This Thread

California tethering restriction law
Law offers little real relief from all the ways people can cruelly confine dogs *LINK* *PIC*
Flawed Proposed Anti-tethering Bylaw in Burnaby, BC: This is what is wrong with laws that only ban or limit tethering *LINK* *PIC*
Another example of why pulley lines or running lines still pose dangers to dogs! *PIC*
Having grown up in Burnaby, and living here now

Share