Animal Advocates Watchdog

Which is it gentlemen?

Do I sense a bit of confusion? Craig Daniell states the decision to suspend the foster program at the Sunshine Coast SPCA is up to the local manager, yet in the newspaper article local manager Tim Kenna is quoted as saying it was a decision on the part of the BCSPCA.

Which is it gentlemen?

Messages In This Thread

Sunshine Coast SPCA suspends fostering program because of "controversy" around the return of seized puppymill dogs *LINK* *PIC*
Mr Daniell's response
I was struck by several inconsistencies in the tales spun by the BCSPCA
Which is it gentlemen?
I would like to confirm that these dogs were not in good shape when we received them
This is a prime example, where the end definitely does not justify the means.
Clarification: only fostering of seized dogs has been suspended we have been told
How does that make it any better?

Share