Animal Advocates Watchdog

Legal opinion confirms AAS opinion on Section 11

AAS paid for legal opinion on section 11 of the PCA Act; the requirement to issue an Offence Warning Notice before seizing

Alexander Holburn Beaudin and Lang,
Vancouver, BC

August 13, 2003

Our plain reading of section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c.372 is that if an authorized agent is of the opinion that an animal is in distress AND the owner does not take steps to relieve the animal's distress or the owner cannot be found and informed of the animal's distress, then the authorized agent many take any action it considers necessary to relieve the animal's distress. So assuming that there is no issue as to being unable to locate the owner, it is only after the owner does not promptly take steps to relieve the animal's distress, that the authorized agent can take any action to relive the animal's distress. This necessarily implies that the SPCA must give the owner an opportunity to take steps to relieve the animal's distress before the SPCA can take any action of its own to relieve the animal's distress, including taking custody of the animal.

Messages In This Thread

THE BC SPCA - UNCHAINED AND DANGEROUS! Part One: 50 years of legalizing animal abuse *LINK* *PIC*
THE BC SPCA - UNCHAINED AND DANGEROUS! Part Two: 2 years of police-state tactics: Craig Daniell in charge
THE BC SPCA - UNCHAINED AND DANGEROUS! Part Three: Killing the "rescued"
THE BC SPCA - UNCHAINED AND DANGEROUS! Part Four: What the PCA Act requires by law *LINK*
Legal opinion confirms AAS opinion on Section 11
THE BC SPCA - UNCHAINED AND DANGEROUS! Part Five: Crushing, criminalizing, and trampling on the rights of its old partners
THE BC SPCA - UNCHAINED AND DANGEROUS! Part Six: Is AAS defending animal abusers? *LINK*
THE BC SPCA - UNCHAINED AND DANGEROUS! Part Seven: Who is ultimately responsible?
THE BC SPCA - UNCHAINED AND DANGEROUS! The CEO acknowledges the requirement of an Offence Warning Notice

Share