Animal Advocates Watchdog

Cheryl Dawson's letter the Times Colonist that the SPCA threatened to sue her for

SPCA needs to control noise

Cheryl Dawson
Times Colonist

Thursday, December 05, 2002
Re: the editorial "Good kennels can make good neighbours," Dec. 2.

It is true that many residents moved to the Burnside area since the 1960s, when the SPCA first located on Napier Lane. However, Burnside has been a residential area since the 1920s and the SPCA's light industrial zoning does not permit noise that disturbs adjacent residents.

That level of disturbance increased sharply in the early 1990s when the SPCA expanded its shelter over the objections of nearby residents.

On many occasions, the city and the local community attempted to resolve noise problems with the SPCA administration. These overtures were simply ignored, leaving the city no choice but to take enforcement action.

As to whether this "new" administration will take a different stand remains to be seen. Only a week ago the local shelter manager was saying publicly that the organization was doing nothing wrong and that neighbours had no basis for their complaints. Shelter staff are reportedly as surly as ever in responding to night-time noise complaints.

Yes there will be a cost for the SPCA to deal with its noise problems. Until it was grabbed by the provincial body, the Victoria SPCA was sitting on endowments worth millions of dollars. Where is that money now?

To suggest that the people living next to the SPCA should pay for more soundproofing is an insult when it has been estimated that past and present administrators spent $100,000 fighting a single bylaw ticket.

Cheryl Dawson,

Sooke.

© Copyright 2002 Times Colonist (Victoria)

Messages In This Thread

A challenge to the SPCA Board of Directors
Should this case go all the way to trial it would cost the SPCA $300,000 plus and the defendants $150,000 plus
The SLAPP happy BC SPCA - $100,000 and counting?
Cheryl Dawson's letter the Times Colonist that the SPCA threatened to sue her for
Then-BC SPCA President, Michael Steven, rebuts
The SPCA did not threaten to sue Ms. Dawson, they did sue her
The SPCA..."Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals" needs to live up to its name
The idea is generally not to let the case go to court but to drain resources and effort from the financially weaker party *LINK*
What are SLAPP suits? *LINK*
BC did have anti-SLAPP legislation until the Liberals got rid of it
Dysfunctional then, dysfunctional now
I attended a meeting in Victoria around the same time
It is because of this lawsuit that I have not donated in the past few months
Lawyers don't need the money as much as animals do! I know, my husband is a lawyer
I ask that the revenues you have be spent on what the donors expect, the animals.
I would like to see more coverage in the media about this ongoing issue
Shame on you SPCA! Live up to your name!
Do something for chained dogs and your critics will turn into your greatest supporters of all
Thankfully God has given a heart for animals to many like WWF, Service Dogs, AAS, and the courage to individuals to speak out
I can't understand why a Society with the means to do so doesn't use its funds to take care of the animals, rather than target other animal groups

Share