Return to Index

Animal Advocates Watchdog

Acceptance of Collateral Damage is Not Animal Welfare
In Response To: Comment: "If" cruelty prevention is legitimate animal welfare ()

Treating animals as "collateral damage" is a betrayal by the "saviors" who are supposed to "speak for them", not silence them with a needle if they take too long to recover.

Acceptance of collateral damage is not animal welfare, it is animal disposal, and it is truly, truly ugly.

Messages In This Thread

Let's make the public aware of Bill 63, and have them make their donations more specific
background on Bill 63 *LINK*
Will we prove in Supreme Court that the SPCA did not ever use any but a tiny fraction of its donations for their intended purpose - animal welfare?
Comment: "If" cruelty prevention is legitimate animal welfare
Acceptance of Collateral Damage is Not Animal Welfare
It is staggering that a person who would rather kill a dear little cocker spaniel than let the competition save it, is directing the BC SPCA *PIC*
Bill 63 - link to text
Another Example...Intent is so Important

Share