Animal Advocates Watchdog

From personal experience, I know that at least one claim by Craig Daniell is untrue

Letter
Published: Monday, March 03, 2008
Re: Attack on SPCA full of misinformation, Soundoff, Feb. 19

From personal experience, I know that at least one claim by Craig Daniell is untrue. He stated, "When the SPCA must euthanize an animal, it is for the same reason so-called 'no-kill' facilities euthanize animals -- to end the suffering of an animal that is beyond medical help or to protect the public from a highly aggressive animal that has not responded to rehabilitation."

The SPCA has euthanized animals when a shelter filled up despite standing offers from rescue groups to take them and despite the fact that cats were suffering from no more than a common curable illness. That is euthanizing for space.

I was the volunteer who put animals on the website for the Maple Ridge and Coquitlam SPCAs. I still have the names and log book numbers of animals that lost their lives needlessly.

Brigitta MacMillan
Maple Ridge

Messages In This Thread

Roslyn Cassells's Soundoff about the SPCA is right on the mark
Progressive animal welfare? I think not *LINK*
From personal experience, I know that at least one claim by Craig Daniell is untrue
Roslyn Cassells's Soundoff: "The SPCA Deserves None of Our Money"
BC SPCA CEO Craig Daniell: "Attack on SPCA Full of Misinformation"
I don't know any no-kill group that would kill 131 cats for illness or aggression in ten months *LINK*
Q & A with the Parksville SPCA about feral cats
Feral cats' lives are valued by real animal welfarists Like PAF on the North Shore *LINK* *PIC*
Animal Advocates Society has questioned the veracity of many SPCA statements made for many years
Questions about conflicts of SPCA mandates: Who should be killing animals?
Why has the SPCA taken the position that it has a duty to protect the public from "aggressive" cats?
Is the SPCA ever going to get it right???

Share