Animal Advocates Watchdog

Nathan Winograd: "Killing in the face of alternatives of which you are not aware, but should be, is unforgivable"

Whenever a shelter kills a homeless animal entrusted to its care, it has profoundly failed. And animal shelters fail, as a general rule, fifty to eighty percent of the time. Put another way, animal sheltering is an industry whose leadership mostly fails. Unlike any other industry, however, these directors still retain their positions, are pillars of their communities, and are tapped as “experts” by the large national groups. That credibility, and esteem, has been seriously threatened by the No Kill movement. In other words, animal control directors — fearful of being held accountable for failure — are putting their own interests ahead of the lives of the animals.

The second possible reason is guilt. Having killed hundreds, thousands, or tens of thousands of dogs and cats, convinced there was no other way, shelter administrators are not able to face the fact that the vast majority of the killing they do is unnecessary.

Another possibility — and perhaps the most likely — is the most disturbing of all: some shelter directors don’t care enough about the animals. Killing in the face of alternatives of which you are not aware, but should be, is unforgivable. It would be like a doctor who refuses to keep pace with the changing field of medicine, treating pneumonia with leeches instead of rest, antibiotics and fluid therapy. Killing in the face of alternatives you simply refuse to implement, or about which you remain willfully ignorant, is nothing short of obscene.

Messages In This Thread

Nathan Winograd: If any word in the vernacular of animal sheltering is misleading, it is the term "euthanasia." *LINK*
Nathan Winograd: "Killing in the face of alternatives of which you are not aware, but should be, is unforgivable"
Nathan Winograd: Changing the words, not the actions: How the big players spin heads by spinning words *LINK*
What did BC SPCA CEO Craig Daniell mean by "so-called" no-kill facilities? *LINK*
We recently wrote the BC SPCA and asked it for its list of reasons an animal can be labelled "unadoptable" and killed
The animal control business is divided between nuisance pets and nuisance wildlife
Why did Surrey Mayor Diane Watts say the SPCA is no-kill?
Why did the Surrey SPCA kill all these old dogs?
It would be interesting to know how these other groups, with or without facilities, define no-kill
Are kennel cough or cat colds enough to put an animal on the SPCA's "euth" list? *LINK*
Animal Controller could face jail time for killing cats

Share