Animal Advocates Watchdog

The animal control business is divided between nuisance pets and nuisance wildlife

Those agencies which control nuisance pets are sometimes known as "the dog catcher" and/or "the pound". The agency may be municipally-run or a municipality may contract with an agency like the BC SPCA to be the dog-catcher, or the impound/disposer, or both.

These nuisance pet control agencies, including the BC SPCA, protect the public from nuisance pets such as stray dogs, cats, rabbits, etc, by collecting them (by actively picking them up, or by accepting them from the public which has caught them) and disposing of them (by selling or killing). The disposal of nuisance wildlife (rabbits and rodents, etc, are the business of frankly-named "Pest Control" companies which don't have any need, not having any animal-loving donators, to obscure why they are killing animals.

Messages In This Thread

Nathan Winograd: If any word in the vernacular of animal sheltering is misleading, it is the term "euthanasia." *LINK*
Nathan Winograd: "Killing in the face of alternatives of which you are not aware, but should be, is unforgivable"
Nathan Winograd: Changing the words, not the actions: How the big players spin heads by spinning words *LINK*
What did BC SPCA CEO Craig Daniell mean by "so-called" no-kill facilities? *LINK*
We recently wrote the BC SPCA and asked it for its list of reasons an animal can be labelled "unadoptable" and killed
The animal control business is divided between nuisance pets and nuisance wildlife
Why did Surrey Mayor Diane Watts say the SPCA is no-kill?
Why did the Surrey SPCA kill all these old dogs?
It would be interesting to know how these other groups, with or without facilities, define no-kill
Are kennel cough or cat colds enough to put an animal on the SPCA's "euth" list? *LINK*
Animal Controller could face jail time for killing cats

Share