Animal Advocates Watchdog
Read background, photos, video *LINK* *PIC*
In Response To: Lawyer prevents destruction order: The SPCA was in Surrey Provincial court Thursday trying to have the dogs destroyed *LINK* ()
As the City of Surrey's dog control agency, the BC SPCA's Surrey Branch applies for court orders to kill dogs the City and/or the SPCA have deemed dangerous.
The Surrey SPCA applied to kill Ed Chase's dog 'Raymond' without even testing him (read stories, video, photos), and now has applied to kill the Harris pit bulls, one of which may be a puppy. Why does the BC SPCA have contracts to protect the public from dogs when its mandate is to protect dogs from the public?
If one is still a puppy, would the BC SPCA apply to kill a puppy?
Messages In This Thread
- Lawyer prevents destruction order: The SPCA was in Surrey Provincial court Thursday trying to have the dogs destroyed *LINK*
- BC SPCA says all its Pit Bulls tested. Did the SPCA test the Harris Pit Bulls?
- Read background, photos, video *LINK* *PIC*
- Write Mayor Diane Watts and Council
- The SPCA's Destruction Application was for four dogs. CTV says only three were represented in court today. What happened to the 4th? *LINK*
- Surrey Leader: Lawyer forces City/SPCA to get independent assessment *LINK* *PIC*
- Vancouver Sun, Ian Mulgrew: SPCA has already killed one of the Harris Pit Bulls
- The Province: The numbers of dogs is puzzling *LINK*
- Why is a private animal-lover having to hire lawyers to protect dogs, some only puppies, from the SPCA?
- The BC SPCA/City of Surrey Land Deal *LINK*
- Thank goodness that a lawyer was hired who is not reluctant to speak for those who cannot speak for themselves. But why is the BC SPCA silent?
- I was biten by all 5 dogs
- Read background, photos, video *LINK* *PIC*
- BC SPCA says all its Pit Bulls tested. Did the SPCA test the Harris Pit Bulls?
