Here's an interesting comment: Mayor Diane Watts says the Surrey SPCA is no kill

Animal Advocates Watchdog

In Response To: Thank goodness that a lawyer was hired who is not reluctant to speak for those who cannot speak for themselves. But why is the BC SPCA silent? ()

Perhaps Mayor Diane Watts would like to comment? She can remind the media of what she told animal activist Roslyn Cassells, in a June 24th email: 'We also have a no kill policy at our City Pound. I can categorically say that I do not believe in the killing of animals. Euthaniztion should only be used for sick or extremely injured animals.'

This seems an odd thing to say, coming from a person who can't help but know that her city pays the SPCA to be the city pound and to kill certain dogs.

Messages In This Thread

Lawyer prevents destruction order: The SPCA was in Surrey Provincial court Thursday trying to have the dogs destroyed *LINK*

BC SPCA says all its Pit Bulls tested. Did the SPCA test the Harris Pit Bulls?

Read background, photos, video *LINK* *PIC*

Write Mayor Diane Watts and Council

The SPCA's Destruction Application was for four dogs. CTV says only three were represented in court today. What happened to the 4th? *LINK*

Or was the puppy spared after there was bad p.r. about the SPCA applying to kill a puppy? *LINK*

Surrey Leader: Lawyer forces City/SPCA to get independent assessment *LINK* *PIC*

Vancouver Sun, Ian Mulgrew: SPCA has already killed one of the Harris Pit Bulls

The Province: The numbers of dogs is puzzling *LINK*

Why is a private animal-lover having to hire lawyers to protect dogs, some only puppies, from the SPCA?

The BC SPCA/City of Surrey Land Deal *LINK*

Thank goodness that a lawyer was hired who is not reluctant to speak for those who cannot speak for themselves. But why is the BC SPCA silent?

Here's an interesting comment: Mayor Diane Watts says the Surrey SPCA is no kill

I was biten by all 5 dogs

Return to Index