Animal Advocates Watchdog

Why is a private animal-lover having to hire lawyers to protect dogs, some only puppies, from the SPCA?

Here is what Ian Mulgrew of the Vancouver Sun wrote at http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=93c86867-a6df-4db2-a49b-e8343d0cf33a
'I have learned two of the dogs in custody are considered puppies and the third dog has given birth to a litter while in the care of the pound.'

'In the care of' is not a phrase that we would have used for any pound; not for dogs that a pound is trying to have killed; not for any dogs in cells, surrounded by more hysterical dogs in cells, all awaiting a fate that can include death for reasons such as kennel cough or just because they are one of too many. Pounds have not improved significantly since the 1800s. Most SPCA 'shelters', for dogs especially, are still based on that model.

'In the charge of' is the correct term for pounds that seize and apply to kill dogs for municipalities and that includes the BC SPCA's pounds. Applying to kill puppies is beyond the pale, but it reveals a side to the pound contracting business that the SPCA is in that has long needed revealing.

The SPCA, in our opinion, should not be taking money to kill dogs or to apply to kill dogs for its bosses at Surrey City Hall, nor any other City Hall in BC. But the BC SPCA is deeply involved with the City of Surrey. Look at the land deal being arranged between the two: http://www.animaladvocates.com/top-stories/harris-pitbulls/land-deal.pdf

Messages In This Thread

Lawyer prevents destruction order: The SPCA was in Surrey Provincial court Thursday trying to have the dogs destroyed *LINK*
BC SPCA says all its Pit Bulls tested. Did the SPCA test the Harris Pit Bulls?
Read background, photos, video *LINK* *PIC*
Write Mayor Diane Watts and Council
The SPCA's Destruction Application was for four dogs. CTV says only three were represented in court today. What happened to the 4th? *LINK*
Or was the puppy spared after there was bad p.r. about the SPCA applying to kill a puppy? *LINK*
Surrey Leader: Lawyer forces City/SPCA to get independent assessment *LINK* *PIC*
Vancouver Sun, Ian Mulgrew: SPCA has already killed one of the Harris Pit Bulls
The Province: The numbers of dogs is puzzling *LINK*
Why is a private animal-lover having to hire lawyers to protect dogs, some only puppies, from the SPCA?
The BC SPCA/City of Surrey Land Deal *LINK*
Thank goodness that a lawyer was hired who is not reluctant to speak for those who cannot speak for themselves. But why is the BC SPCA silent?
Here's an interesting comment: Mayor Diane Watts says the Surrey SPCA is no kill
I was biten by all 5 dogs

Share