Animal Advocates Watchdog

The SPCA's Destruction Application was for four dogs. CTV says only three were represented in court today. What happened to the 4th? *LINK*

Read the SPCA's Application for an Order to Detroy four pit bulls at http://www.animaladvocates.com/top-stories/images/harris-pit-bulls-destruction-app.pdf

Yet the CTV news item says, "Three pit bulls, which are literally sitting on death row in Surrey, B.C., have been granted a reprieve, after a group of dog lovers hired a lawyer in the hope that the dogs will be spared."

Since the SPCA has to apply to the court to kill seized dogs that haven't been surrendered by their owner, could it have killed one of the four? That doesn't seem likely.

Messages In This Thread

Lawyer prevents destruction order: The SPCA was in Surrey Provincial court Thursday trying to have the dogs destroyed *LINK*
BC SPCA says all its Pit Bulls tested. Did the SPCA test the Harris Pit Bulls?
Read background, photos, video *LINK* *PIC*
Write Mayor Diane Watts and Council
The SPCA's Destruction Application was for four dogs. CTV says only three were represented in court today. What happened to the 4th? *LINK*
Or was the puppy spared after there was bad p.r. about the SPCA applying to kill a puppy? *LINK*
Surrey Leader: Lawyer forces City/SPCA to get independent assessment *LINK* *PIC*
Vancouver Sun, Ian Mulgrew: SPCA has already killed one of the Harris Pit Bulls
The Province: The numbers of dogs is puzzling *LINK*
Why is a private animal-lover having to hire lawyers to protect dogs, some only puppies, from the SPCA?
The BC SPCA/City of Surrey Land Deal *LINK*
Thank goodness that a lawyer was hired who is not reluctant to speak for those who cannot speak for themselves. But why is the BC SPCA silent?
Here's an interesting comment: Mayor Diane Watts says the Surrey SPCA is no kill
I was biten by all 5 dogs

Share