Animal Advocates Watchdog

Not having to prove intent to be cruel can lead to abuses of power like the seizure of Gwen Wilson's animals

The SPCA seized Gwen Wilson's beloved, plump, and happy dog Dakota, for having a smaller lick granuloma on his leg, at the same time it seized her cats, and made her pay almost $4000 to get him back. You can read all about this on Gwen's AAS web pages: http://www.animaladvocates.com/seizures/wilson.
The SPCA had charges laid against Gwen, a kind-hearted woman, who had abandoned cats dumped on her by people who didn't want the cats to go to the SPCA because the SPCA killed so many of them, or didn't want to pay the SPCA $50 to take their cat. Gwen produced medications she was giving an old cat, but the SPCA took it outside and shot it; or at least had the armed RCMP it brings with it, shoot it. Shooting animals is a legal form of destruction, but what is a so-called animal welfare organization doing shooting animals? That makes it hard to oppose shooting animals doesn't it? It only very recently said it didn't approve of the shooting of the feral rabbits in Kelowna. The public has to know that this animal-welfare organization orders the police it brings with it to seizures to shoot animals rather than save them. What a blatant contradiction that is.

I am never going to forget Gwen and what the SPCA did to her. AAS is still paying the food bills for Gwen's remaining animals, even though she died a year ago. We are doing that in memory of a kind person who took care of many of Chilliwack's abandoned cats for years at great expense out of her tiny resources; cats that we believe the SPCA should have been helping her with, instead of making the last eighteen years of her life a brutal nightmare of having to plead guilty to charges that she was cruel to animals, that did not have to be, and should not have been, laid by the SPCA.

Messages In This Thread

Kelowna woman sees two EBB employees stomping on a rabbit's head *LINK* *PIC*
How many other inhumane deaths have there been?
Root Cause: Who sells intact rabbits?
Root Cause: Rabbits martyred by hypocrites who sell rabbits
Root Cause: An animal welfare/animal protection society that says it's okay to shoot feral rabbits
Root Cause: Would the BC SPCA condone shooting dogs or cats if the Wildlife Act said once they were feral they fell under the Wildlife Act?
Air rifle use suspended in rabbit extermination
PETA: shooting rabbits in Kelowna with firearms is immeasurably cruel. Who to write to *LINK*
RCMP say cruelty charges won't be laid in rabbit stomping death
That statement is completely wrong. No intent is needed to lay charges under the PCA Act
Not requiring intent is both a good and a bad thing. Not good if you are a cat rescuer or have a dog with a sore on its leg *LINK*
The public is still ignorant of the fact that technically the PCA Act allows the SPCA to seize any animal ...
Not having to prove intent to be cruel can lead to abuses of power like the seizure of Gwen Wilson's animals
The SPCA seized Gwen's dog Dakota, but did not even investigate a very sick dog held in the pound owned by own of its ex-employees *LINK* *PIC*
Abbotsford pound will kill animal if it requires more than $50 of medical care
This offensively low amount alloted to each animal...
In this case charges couldn't even be contemplated under the PCA Act
Pest Control Operator Prosecuted
Under the Criminal Code, the killing of a stray animal is permitted for any reason
BC SPCA responds to concerns over rabbit stomping incident
SPCA changes position on shooting rabbits

Share