Animal Advocates Watchdog

Paws-R-Us considered a puppymill by investigating officer for the Montreal SPCA

Paws R Us is considered a puppy mill by Alanna Devine, the Executive Director of the Montreal SPCA as well as Daniel Davenport, an investigating officer for the Montreal SPCA.

Here's Davenport's testimony as recorded by the defense:

Defendant’s witness Daniel Davenport testified that he carries officer-of-the-peace status in Quebec. He is an investigating officer of the Montreal SPCA and has been for twenty years. He testified that he visited the facilities of Paws-R-Us five times until he was refused entry in February 2005. He explained that in Quebec there are several organizations that govern the breeding of dogs. He testified that during his inspections of Paws-R-Us, he did note a number of health concerns, such as open sores on the dogs, extremely dirty kennel areas, and over-crowding. He testified that with each visit he would examine paper records and from the documents could say that there was 80-85 different breeds of adult dogs. When asked about the number of puppies, Mr. Davenport testified that from May 1999 to March 2000 he received reports from the attending veterinarian of vaccinations of 412 five-week old puppies that were followed until they were 12 weeks old. He also testified that on one day in April 2000 the attending veterinarian reported vaccinating 312 puppies 6-weeks of age or older. Mr. Davenport never testified that he counted all of the dogs in all of the buildings at Paws-R-Us. He did state that at the times that he inspected the operation, there were many dogs and they were kept in sub-standard conditions. When asked if they were a puppy mill, he responded that in his professional opinion Paws-R-Us was a puppy mill at the times that he did his inspections. He further testified that just because he believed that they were a puppy mill, in Quebec that is not enough to file charges. He explained that in Quebec the test that they must meet is found in the Criminal Code of Canada and the dogs must be abused to the point of life-threatening conditions. Mr. Davenport was asked to confirm that he believed that Paws-R-Us was a puppy mill and he confirmed in examination and in cross-examination that Paws-R-Us was a puppy mill.

Messages In This Thread

Ontario Superior Court/Small Claims, says Lorie Dixon defamed Paws-R-Us by calling it a puppymill *LINK*
Paws-R-Us considered a puppymill by investigating officer for the Montreal SPCA
SPCAs may want to challenge the ruling by funding Dixon's appeal of the ruling
BC SPCA definition of a puppymill *LINK* *PIC*
BC SPCA doesn't hesitate to define a puppymill *LINK*
Did Lorie Dixon's lawyer get evidentiary support from more SPCAs in Canada?
Here is where you can donate to Lorie Dixon's appeal fund
Examples of BC SPCA calling breeding facilies "puppymills" *PIC*
BC judge "agrees" that a breeder is a puppymill *LINK*
Who first used the word "puppymill" in this BC trial? *LINK* *PIC*

Share