Animal Advocates Watchdog
Who first used the word "puppymill" in this BC trial? Was it the BC SPCA? Or was it Crown? If Crown, then who told Crown that the Materi's breeding facility was a puppymill?
BC Povincial Court may be a superior court to the small claims court in Ontario in which Lorie Dixon's case was heard.
Did Lorie Dixon's lawyer use this judgment in a BC court as precedent? After all, the conditions a BC judge found to be a puppymill, were far superior to the conditions that have been described at Paws-R-Us.
Photo of some of the dogs, taken by SPCA while seizing them and many other animals from Alan Materi and Gail Collingwood. The SPCA's seizure resulted in Alan Materi being charged and convicted of "cruelty". If this is a puppymill, then surely Paws-R-Us is.
Messages In This Thread
- Ontario Superior Court/Small Claims, says Lorie Dixon defamed Paws-R-Us by calling it a puppymill *LINK*
- Paws-R-Us considered a puppymill by investigating officer for the Montreal SPCA
- SPCAs may want to challenge the ruling by funding Dixon's appeal of the ruling
- BC SPCA definition of a puppymill *LINK* *PIC*
- BC SPCA doesn't hesitate to define a puppymill *LINK*
- Did Lorie Dixon's lawyer get evidentiary support from more SPCAs in Canada?
- Here is where you can donate to Lorie Dixon's appeal fund
- Examples of BC SPCA calling breeding facilies "puppymills" *PIC*
- BC judge "agrees" that a breeder is a puppymill *LINK*
- Who first used the word "puppymill" in this BC trial? *LINK* *PIC*
- SPCAs may want to challenge the ruling by funding Dixon's appeal of the ruling
- Paws-R-Us considered a puppymill by investigating officer for the Montreal SPCA
