Animal Advocates Watchdog

Craig Daniell said he would not spend animals' money on suing AAS

The concerns raised about how the general public, members and supporters of the BCSPCA will feel when they find out that some of their donated dollars are being used in suing AAS are very valid. To take away money from the animals in order to pay for an almost certainly high priced lawsuit against people with real concerns is really unacceptable in my opinion.

Actually Craig Daniell himself agreed with this, last February, during a meeting we had with him to discuss various issues. He told my husband and I that although he felt that he had the right to sue AAS he would NOT do so because that would take money away from the animals.

It seems like he has changed his mind since then and spending this money on the animals must now have become a lower priority than paying for an expensive lawsuit!

Messages In This Thread

Keep that WatchDog barking!
Could such use of monies be classed as fraudulent??!!
When the public finds out that the SPCA is using their money to sue AAS, there will be a backlash that it has never experienced before
Craig Daniell said he would not spend animals' money on suing AAS
According to the mandate of the BCSPCA Board of Directors, regardless of what Mr. Daniell says or thinks, HE is not the ultimate authority in regard to a lawsuit

Share