Animal Advocates Watchdog

well to the SPCA..that I have supported my whole life..I say you are a fraud

The SPCA worker said very clearly 11.000.00 to myself and my sister Nicole. Because we both went... Why would someone pay 11.000.00 for ten dogs?

Whatever the payment was...that is not the issue..the issue here is why are 10 dogs that were seized from sub standard conditions..Quoted by Eileen Drever, senior SPCA employee in the Sun article of May 15, are being returned to those conditons.

Why are the dogs returned to a less than reputable breeders after being rescued and nursed back to health by foster parent.

We have all been told that we should not foster any more...why.. because we are raising a stink that the dogs are being returned to the so called HOBBY FARM in Chilliwack. We as SPCA supporting community minded people were under the impression the SPCA was fighting to take these animals away from the owner.

The SPCA employees we have spoken with say we do not know all the details, we do not understand...

We as the foster parents understand one thing..these dogs were in horrible shape and had probably never seen the outside of a cage...they were bred and bred and bred...period..little money making machines..not pets..not friends..not loved ones but objects with which to promote a cash flow.

One SPCA worker said today we were uniformed and naive...well to the SPCA..that I have supported my whole life..I say you are a fraud..and I will not foster ever again..because everyday I will live with the fact that I subjected my family to fostering these poor dogs to be taking away and returned to a breeder. My heart is broken by the reality that I am naive and I grew up thinking the SPCA helps dogs...I am naive because I thought SPCA employees care about animals, but will still crate the dogs up and send them back to HELL.

Messages In This Thread

SPCA to give dogs back to Chilliwack puppymiller after being paid "seizure costs".
Patricia Best supplies more information
letter to the BC SPCA Board of Directors
Letter to the BC SPCA Board of Directors from Nikki Boechler
Letter to the BC SPCA from Olivia Candille
A letter from Carol Sonnex
AAS will be getting a legal opinion
Legal opinion from Alexander, Holburn, Beaudin & Lang agrees with AAS interpretation
AAS letter to Craig Daniell asking that the SPCA not return the dogs to the puppy miller
Craig Daniell just told AAS that the sum paid by the Chilliwack puppymiller was not $11,000.
well to the SPCA..that I have supported my whole life..I say you are a fraud
The dogs came from a Chilliwack "Hobby Farm", seized May 13/0
More legal questions about custody orders. AAS will be looking for answers
News story - Coast Reporter
News Story, May/03 Chilliwack Progress
Thank God we are making a stand...someone has to...
Foster Home Fallacy
The SPCA contradicts itself
Eileen Drever says the PCA Act made them do it
Six months from seizure to conviction *LINK*
The point at issue is: Could returning animals make it doubtful a court would prohibit ownership?
Can the SPCA expect Crown to accept this case now that the SPCA has said the animals never were in that bad physical condition?
The public needs to know....
In April of this year, I very publicly condemned the Kamloops SPCA
SPCA Double Speak: This place is no benign "Hobby Farm": There is no legal definition of a puppy mill
I will definetly NOT support the S.P.C.A.
How does this solution benefit the animals? Or is the solution not supposed to?
SPCA double speak: justifying returning the Chilliwack Puppy Mill dogs
Is the SPCA going to say that the puppy miller can be trusted to meet its own definition of "responsible guardianship"?
Craig Daniell's "form answer" justifying the return of the dogs
Patricia Josh Best responds
Chilliwack Times, July 29/03
Throw in the Downy, the spin cycle is on. Patricia Best answers the SPCA
Patricia to meet with Craig Daniell
Chihuahua rescue: From what I can gather from talking to Eileen Drever, the SPCA sets its policies and it is due to money, budget restraints, and time.
The meeting was postponed *NM*
SPCA: back to blaming the law for what it does not do to protect animals
Bottom line is - the SPCA chose not to use the law and return the dogs. Why?
As a person who has personally rehabilitated puppy mill dogs for years, I question the "seizure costs"
Damage Control: Will the SPCA reseize the Chilliwack puppy mill dogs?

Share