Animal Advocates Watchdog

Letter to the BC SPCA Board of Directors from Nikki Boechler

----- Original Message -----
From: Nikki
To: info@spca.bc.ca
Cc: ianeditor@dccnet.com ; sunnewstips@pacpress.southam.ca ; Jasmine Morgan ; pjbest@telus.net
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 9:12 AM
Subject: ATTENTION:The Board of Directors SPCA

Hello:

My name is Nikki Boechler and I have been a supporter of the SPCA for years. In fact I took part in our local SPCA Walkathon in the pouring rain last year with both of my dogs.

For the past month or so I’ve been fostering a Chihuahua that was seized from a “hobby farm” in Chilliwack. The dog I was fostering, as well as all the others is being returned to the owner because apparently the owner has come up with the $11, 000.00 dollars in fees she had been charged. We were assured that this was going to court for a possession order...like good citizens we have all returned the dogs to the local SPCA, but being in a small community my mother in law decided to try and track down the other fosters and found out that the dogs are actually being returned because she’s paid her “FEE” to the SPCA. That fee would be $1,100 per dog and I’m not sure where that expense comes from as I took the dog and didn’t receive anything else from the SPCA in order to care for her. I supplied her food, water, shelter, etc. But that’s not really the point. Your press clippings even quoted Eileen Driver, a senior SPCA enforcement officer talking about they shameful conditions that these dogs were living under. I have been living under the illusion that your job was to protect animals.... not charge a boarding fee than ship them back. Tell me what I can do to help change the laws so these poor helpless animals will not continue to be used as financial pawns! When the conditions at this hobby farm are bad again and there is a phone call to have the dogs taken, all that will happen to the owner is a fine, she knows that. How will that make the situation better? The victim is not the owner, the SPCA or myself, the victims are the dogs.

We were also told that the SPCA doesn’t really have the means to go to court and fight these puppy mills or hobby farms. It would have cost nothing to have myself or any of the others that were fostering to get up on the stand and tell what sort of condition the dogs were in when we got them. The dog I was fostering for example was so malnourished and not exercised that she was well under what her normal weight should be. She chewed her paws incessantly and her ears were so chapped I didn’t think that they were even supposed to have fur on them. After a month of being away from the “hobby farm” her ears are covered in fur and all the chapping has cleared up.

I am forwarding this email to my local newspaper as well as other people who have been outraged by this situation. I do expect a response and would like to be kept in touch about this matter.

Regards,
Nikki Boechler
Gibsons, BC

Messages In This Thread

SPCA to give dogs back to Chilliwack puppymiller after being paid "seizure costs".
Patricia Best supplies more information
letter to the BC SPCA Board of Directors
Letter to the BC SPCA Board of Directors from Nikki Boechler
Letter to the BC SPCA from Olivia Candille
A letter from Carol Sonnex
AAS will be getting a legal opinion
Legal opinion from Alexander, Holburn, Beaudin & Lang agrees with AAS interpretation
AAS letter to Craig Daniell asking that the SPCA not return the dogs to the puppy miller
Craig Daniell just told AAS that the sum paid by the Chilliwack puppymiller was not $11,000.
well to the SPCA..that I have supported my whole life..I say you are a fraud
The dogs came from a Chilliwack "Hobby Farm", seized May 13/0
More legal questions about custody orders. AAS will be looking for answers
News story - Coast Reporter
News Story, May/03 Chilliwack Progress
Thank God we are making a stand...someone has to...
Foster Home Fallacy
The SPCA contradicts itself
Eileen Drever says the PCA Act made them do it
Six months from seizure to conviction *LINK*
The point at issue is: Could returning animals make it doubtful a court would prohibit ownership?
Can the SPCA expect Crown to accept this case now that the SPCA has said the animals never were in that bad physical condition?
The public needs to know....
In April of this year, I very publicly condemned the Kamloops SPCA
SPCA Double Speak: This place is no benign "Hobby Farm": There is no legal definition of a puppy mill
I will definetly NOT support the S.P.C.A.
How does this solution benefit the animals? Or is the solution not supposed to?
SPCA double speak: justifying returning the Chilliwack Puppy Mill dogs
Is the SPCA going to say that the puppy miller can be trusted to meet its own definition of "responsible guardianship"?
Craig Daniell's "form answer" justifying the return of the dogs
Patricia Josh Best responds
Chilliwack Times, July 29/03
Throw in the Downy, the spin cycle is on. Patricia Best answers the SPCA
Patricia to meet with Craig Daniell
Chihuahua rescue: From what I can gather from talking to Eileen Drever, the SPCA sets its policies and it is due to money, budget restraints, and time.
The meeting was postponed *NM*
SPCA: back to blaming the law for what it does not do to protect animals
Bottom line is - the SPCA chose not to use the law and return the dogs. Why?
As a person who has personally rehabilitated puppy mill dogs for years, I question the "seizure costs"
Damage Control: Will the SPCA reseize the Chilliwack puppy mill dogs?

Share