Animal Advocates Watchdog

News Story, May/03 Chilliwack Progress

By Penny Lett
At 9 a.m., May 13, Chilliwack veterinarian, Dr. Mark Steinebach, received the call to attend a cruelty complaint. At noon, senior animal protection officer, Eileen Drever, had the search warrant.
By 6:30 p.m., 10 dogs had been seized from a farm on Keith Wilson Road. The name of the owner cannot be released until formal charges are laid under the B.C. Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act.
“These dogs had reached a degree of distress that needed to be relieved right away,” says Dr. Steinebach.
Three of the animals, two female basenjis and a male Chihuahua, were in such poor shape, they were not released from hospital until May 16.
“One of the basenjis and the Chihuahua had such badly-infected and abscessed teeth and gums, that after the teeth were removed, you could see through to the sinuses,” says Dr. Steinebach. “Also, the Chihuahua’s jaw had fractured from the infection.”
The basenjis each took two hours and the Chihuahua three, for the dental work to be completed. Depending upon the breed, most dogs have 40 teeth. Fifteen had to be removed from the Chihuahua, the rest had already fallen out. He has four left.
“Five dogs were tested and found to have hookworms, tapeworms, fleas, dermatitis, and diarrhea,” says Dr. Steinebach. “It’s safe to say, as they were all in close contact with one another, all are infected and being treated.”
Of the 10 animals taken, two (a Maltese-cross and a miniature pincher) were found in the home. The others were found in a small, dark, barn and included six Chihuahuas and two basenjis. They were confined to Vari kennels, chicken cages with wire floors, and a partially-folded exercise pen. It was a hot day, and they had no water.
“Every dog we released, went straight for water,” says Dr. Steinebach. “One seven-pound Chihuahua drank two bowls full ... and the scene was repeated with each one.”
They all he says, fit the definition of distress with regard to housing, disease, pain, and water.
The farm also had four husky-cross dogs and two rough collies. These were not seized as the owner, who had not been home when the warrant was executed, returned and gave them clean water. Though the collies needed grooming they and the huskies were in fairly-good condition.
Ms. Drever says all the seized dogs are now recuperating and being cared for in an SPCA facility. The warrant was issued after a complaint came in from the public on May 9, and charges are being considered under the B.C. Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act.
The B.C. SPCA has six months in which to lay charges.
“This is what the B.C. SPCA Cruelty Investigation Department is all about,” says Ms. Drever. “And we’re grateful to the public for caring about animals they know or suspect are in distress. It’s public cooperation and public donations that make these investigations possible.”

Messages In This Thread

SPCA to give dogs back to Chilliwack puppymiller after being paid "seizure costs".
Patricia Best supplies more information
letter to the BC SPCA Board of Directors
Letter to the BC SPCA Board of Directors from Nikki Boechler
Letter to the BC SPCA from Olivia Candille
A letter from Carol Sonnex
AAS will be getting a legal opinion
Legal opinion from Alexander, Holburn, Beaudin & Lang agrees with AAS interpretation
AAS letter to Craig Daniell asking that the SPCA not return the dogs to the puppy miller
Craig Daniell just told AAS that the sum paid by the Chilliwack puppymiller was not $11,000.
well to the SPCA..that I have supported my whole life..I say you are a fraud
The dogs came from a Chilliwack "Hobby Farm", seized May 13/0
More legal questions about custody orders. AAS will be looking for answers
News story - Coast Reporter
News Story, May/03 Chilliwack Progress
Thank God we are making a stand...someone has to...
Foster Home Fallacy
The SPCA contradicts itself
Eileen Drever says the PCA Act made them do it
Six months from seizure to conviction *LINK*
The point at issue is: Could returning animals make it doubtful a court would prohibit ownership?
Can the SPCA expect Crown to accept this case now that the SPCA has said the animals never were in that bad physical condition?
The public needs to know....
In April of this year, I very publicly condemned the Kamloops SPCA
SPCA Double Speak: This place is no benign "Hobby Farm": There is no legal definition of a puppy mill
I will definetly NOT support the S.P.C.A.
How does this solution benefit the animals? Or is the solution not supposed to?
SPCA double speak: justifying returning the Chilliwack Puppy Mill dogs
Is the SPCA going to say that the puppy miller can be trusted to meet its own definition of "responsible guardianship"?
Craig Daniell's "form answer" justifying the return of the dogs
Patricia Josh Best responds
Chilliwack Times, July 29/03
Throw in the Downy, the spin cycle is on. Patricia Best answers the SPCA
Patricia to meet with Craig Daniell
Chihuahua rescue: From what I can gather from talking to Eileen Drever, the SPCA sets its policies and it is due to money, budget restraints, and time.
The meeting was postponed *NM*
SPCA: back to blaming the law for what it does not do to protect animals
Bottom line is - the SPCA chose not to use the law and return the dogs. Why?
As a person who has personally rehabilitated puppy mill dogs for years, I question the "seizure costs"
Damage Control: Will the SPCA reseize the Chilliwack puppy mill dogs?

Share