Ms Troman writes, "I find Judy Stone's determination to dredge up out of date and inaccurate information and her absolute refusal to acknowledge positive changes wearisome. Her ongoing attempts to discredit the Society only hampers our ability to support the animals who need us. "

1. "Dredging up" is important to show that the SPCA has a long, ignoble history that forced real animal welfarists to risk the SPCA millions and lawyers, to expose it. "Dredging up" would just be mean-spirited if the SPCA had changed substantially, but until it does, "dredging up" will still be important.

2. Does Ms Troman consider SPCA actions as recent as two weeks ago, to be "dredging up"? What is the cut-off date for "dredging up" and "not dredging up"? Do warrantless seizures, gag orders, killing healthy animals, letting dogs like Bojangles dies slowly and painfully, constitute "dredging up out of date information"?

3. Does Ms Troman consider "inaccurate" any facts that we have copied right from SPCA web sites?

4. Let me point out some of your "inaccurate" statements Ms Troman. I have pointed out every thing positive that I have ever learned that the SPCA is doing, but there are so few that they tend to get lost. There are the two changes that we forced you to make (staff breeding and selling and the SPCA killing for cash), and the Community Consultation Report, which, as you are perfectly well aware, we praised the SPCA for many times. We praised Mr Daniell for six months, or at least would not join in the criticism of him, until the scales dropped from our eyes.

5. We're all wearied Ms Troman, but until the SPCA stops seizing healthy animals, stops killing healthy animals, and apologizes and reimburses those it has defamed and injured, the fight goes on.