This is my reply to those who would insist that anyone who eats meat or wears leather should not be rescuing animals. Sounds to me like those folks are simply trying to justify their archaic views on animal cruelty.

Posted By: Diane Esther
Date: Saturday, 11 August 2007, at 2:26 p.m.

In Response To: Anyone who eats meat has unbelievable gall to call themselves an animal lover (Lindsay Kaplan)

Wouldn't it be nice if life was so simple as: "I eat meat, thus I am not entitled to care for the well-being of any other animal on the planet"; or conversely: "I do not eat meat, thus I am allowed to care for other creatures".

Certainly, it would be ideal that all humans become vegan - but we know that is not the only premise upon which animal welfare needs to be based. And I agree there is a certain amount of hypocrisy involved here. However, should someone who eats meat not interfere when a dog is set on fire? When a kitten is kicked across a room? When a horse that has stopped earning money for its owners is sent to slaughter?

Perhaps that mind-set lets a lot of people off the hook and is readily used to justify 'not getting involved'.

As long as there are people who are willing to spend their time, money and emotions to protect and defend any helpless creature, I for one am grateful and indebted to them for life, even if they and their pets happen to be carnivores.