Animal Advocates Watchdog

1998 letter from Scott and Natasha Baker: Still relevant because not enough has changed

Scott & Natasha Baker: Vancouver SPCA Volunteers

1998

Letter to the Vancouver SPCA CEO

I am very passionate about promoting the proper of animals and every day I fight for a better understanding of our irreplaceable animal companions, in the hope that one day they may receive the respect they deserve. An animal in need will receive the same attention and care from me as would a human being. No matter how different they are in appearance and behavior, they are as alive as much as we are, and it doesn’t take much to see and respect that! At first the SPCA seemed like a wonderful opportunity for me: I could reach the public and help make a difference alongside all the others fighting for animal rights and help to strengthen the bond between human and animal.

Working for six months as a volunteer in cat adoptions at the Vancouver SPCA has given me a very different picture, however. To me this branch was a factory for the collection, distribution and euthanasia of animals. The term “Auschwitz for animals” is commonly used by volunteers and staff to describe the SPCA. People are filled with sadness, depression, frustration, helplessness, and anger; feeling unappreciated, and burned out …myself included perhaps, by writing this letter I can make a difference after all.

My involvement with the Vancouver SPCA has to some extent included my husband. Although he has not volunteered as an adoptions councilor, he has met with several members of the staff and has “stuck around” on several occasions. He has also been my sympathetic ear when I return from a day at adoptions which has left him just as frustrated as I.

Neither of us approve of making a complaint without providing a possible solution to the problem. Most of the problems we have both seen at the Vancouver SPCA require a fundamental change in the attitude with respect to the current procedures. The required course of action may not always be an easy one, but “taking a stand” is essential.

Attached please find a list of problems we have encountered and their possible solutions. These comprise things that have been observed by ourselves, other volunteers, and patrons. As the list will outline some of these issues are appalling. We feel we can not continue to work in an environment where such things make the performance of one’s duties impossible to accomplish.

One begins to wonder if healthy animals are better off staying on the street than being assigned to the shelter.

I, at least can not continue to work for an organization that can not even meet its own code of Ethics.

Mistreatment and/or neglect of animals by humans is rooted by a fundamental lack of respect for the animal in question. The SPCA should be the leading example for the public of proper animal care, both in word and in deed. The Vancouver SPCA has completely failed in this regard.

Messages In This Thread

1998 letter from Scott and Natasha Baker: Still relevant because not enough has changed
The Vancouver SPCA has completely failed in this regard by: 1. Not providing any form of useful public education
2. Presenting a bad example when dealing with shelter animals
3. Practicing unnecessary euthanasia
A more careful reading of our notes to conversations with Natasha
4. Not providing enough kennels despite the space to do so
5. Not providing young animals with sufficient stimuli
6. Inadequate screening of potential adoptees
7. Being too rigid with respect to enforcing adoption hours
8. Not showing or adopting sick animals
9. No adoption councillor for the dogs
10. The wanton separation of an animal from its personal belongings
11. Insufficient effort to promote the adoption of shelter animals
12. Not suggesting alternatives to the surrender of animals
13. Poor and sometimes cruel displays of animals
14. The complete lack of training of volunteers
15. The complete lack of benefits to the volunteers
16. The complete lack of and adequate job description for volunteers
17. Lack of any hierarchy or chain of command
18. Lack of respect and trust by the staff
19. General lack of manners
20. No attempt to show compassion
21. Lack of a adequate communications channels
22. Lack of follow-up on adoptions
23. Not allowing for the pick-up of a lost cat after visiting hours
24. Misuse of donated funds
25. Inadequate seclusion of “stray” animals
From my time volunteering at the Burnaby SPCA, I came to these conclusions as well
We welcome comment from the SPCA
From the Prince George Free Press
Natasha is just one of hundreds: Brigitta MacMillan also tried to make the SPCA change, with no luck *PIC*
So too did Christine W.
So did Laura Dean
Another letter from Laura Dean
What has changed since November 2001? If I find out that anymore animals have been euthanized, I will go to the media
The organization of as large a scale as the SPCA needs critics and scrutinizing

Share