Animal Advocates Watchdog

7. Being too rigid with respect to enforcing adoption hours

7) Being too rigid with respect to enforcing adoption hours

Currently adoption hours end at 17.00 but viewing of the animals is possible until 17.30. It is very frustrating to the public to be able to view the animals, possibly even selecting a suitable companion, and then not being able to adopt it. They must then return the next day and by that, risk loosing the animal or that it will be killed as the staff will not allow an overnight hold. The animal itself is exposed to added stress and possibly euthanasia by remaining at the shelter. The SPCA should also allow adoption for animals 10-15 minutes past visiting hours, if the adoptee was held up discussing animal care with the adoption counselor.

This conflicts with the SPCA Code of Ethics: Point 1) subparagraph 1 and 2) subparagraph 2

Solution: Stagger the end of adoption viewing hours by restricting access starting at 17.00 and have adoptions end at 17.30 but also allow the flexibility for adoptions up until 18.00. Also allow overnight holds to prevent killing that animal, that terminate 15 minutes after the start of adoptions the next day. This way all that is possible has been done to promote adoptions.

Symptoms: Sometimes under the current system animals that were desired as a companion have been put to death needlessly, simply because their perspective parent arrived 15 minutes late. This is disgusting.

Messages In This Thread

1998 letter from Scott and Natasha Baker: Still relevant because not enough has changed
The Vancouver SPCA has completely failed in this regard by: 1. Not providing any form of useful public education
2. Presenting a bad example when dealing with shelter animals
3. Practicing unnecessary euthanasia
A more careful reading of our notes to conversations with Natasha
4. Not providing enough kennels despite the space to do so
5. Not providing young animals with sufficient stimuli
6. Inadequate screening of potential adoptees
7. Being too rigid with respect to enforcing adoption hours
8. Not showing or adopting sick animals
9. No adoption councillor for the dogs
10. The wanton separation of an animal from its personal belongings
11. Insufficient effort to promote the adoption of shelter animals
12. Not suggesting alternatives to the surrender of animals
13. Poor and sometimes cruel displays of animals
14. The complete lack of training of volunteers
15. The complete lack of benefits to the volunteers
16. The complete lack of and adequate job description for volunteers
17. Lack of any hierarchy or chain of command
18. Lack of respect and trust by the staff
19. General lack of manners
20. No attempt to show compassion
21. Lack of a adequate communications channels
22. Lack of follow-up on adoptions
23. Not allowing for the pick-up of a lost cat after visiting hours
24. Misuse of donated funds
25. Inadequate seclusion of “stray” animals
From my time volunteering at the Burnaby SPCA, I came to these conclusions as well
We welcome comment from the SPCA
From the Prince George Free Press
Natasha is just one of hundreds: Brigitta MacMillan also tried to make the SPCA change, with no luck *PIC*
So too did Christine W.
So did Laura Dean
Another letter from Laura Dean
What has changed since November 2001? If I find out that anymore animals have been euthanized, I will go to the media
The organization of as large a scale as the SPCA needs critics and scrutinizing

Share