Animal Advocates Watchdog

The organization of as large a scale as the SPCA needs critics and scrutinizing

Here's a big proof of what is actually still happening at the SPCA (to our
dismay).
No matter how strongly they insist that the reform was done, no matter
how many grand seizures from the puppymills went on to the media, the core
attittude of the staff is disappointedly the same as before.
Their coldness, lack of compassion for the animals in distress,
bureaucratic excuses, a pick of euthanasia as an easy solution, and
unwillingness to work with good hearted volunteers are only known to those
who cared (like Beth McConnell) and experienced to be there with one
purpose(and with that only)---'to help and save the unfortunate animals'.
It is not known to those who read the articles or watch TV in their living
room but have never been involved in actual, hands-on rescue with
determination not to give up.

It's truly fortunate that the Animal Advocates Society exists as strongly
as ever as a watch dog.
The organization of as large a scale as the SPCA needs critics and scrutinizing
from outside to be operated fairly and transparently. It is
just so crucial.
Hiroko

Messages In This Thread

1998 letter from Scott and Natasha Baker: Still relevant because not enough has changed
The Vancouver SPCA has completely failed in this regard by: 1. Not providing any form of useful public education
2. Presenting a bad example when dealing with shelter animals
3. Practicing unnecessary euthanasia
A more careful reading of our notes to conversations with Natasha
4. Not providing enough kennels despite the space to do so
5. Not providing young animals with sufficient stimuli
6. Inadequate screening of potential adoptees
7. Being too rigid with respect to enforcing adoption hours
8. Not showing or adopting sick animals
9. No adoption councillor for the dogs
10. The wanton separation of an animal from its personal belongings
11. Insufficient effort to promote the adoption of shelter animals
12. Not suggesting alternatives to the surrender of animals
13. Poor and sometimes cruel displays of animals
14. The complete lack of training of volunteers
15. The complete lack of benefits to the volunteers
16. The complete lack of and adequate job description for volunteers
17. Lack of any hierarchy or chain of command
18. Lack of respect and trust by the staff
19. General lack of manners
20. No attempt to show compassion
21. Lack of a adequate communications channels
22. Lack of follow-up on adoptions
23. Not allowing for the pick-up of a lost cat after visiting hours
24. Misuse of donated funds
25. Inadequate seclusion of “stray” animals
From my time volunteering at the Burnaby SPCA, I came to these conclusions as well
We welcome comment from the SPCA
From the Prince George Free Press
Natasha is just one of hundreds: Brigitta MacMillan also tried to make the SPCA change, with no luck *PIC*
So too did Christine W.
So did Laura Dean
Another letter from Laura Dean
What has changed since November 2001? If I find out that anymore animals have been euthanized, I will go to the media
The organization of as large a scale as the SPCA needs critics and scrutinizing

Share