Animal Advocates Watchdog

8. Not showing or adopting sick animals

8)Not showing or adopting sick animals

The current policy of not allowing the public to view animals in the sick room should be addressed. Certain potential adoptees who demonstrate the willingness and desire to care for a sick animal can provide better care for that animal than is possible at the shelter. Especially when one considers that many of the animals that become sick are killed because there is not enough space in the sick room.

This conflicts with the SPCA Code of Ethics: Point 1) subparagraph 1

Solution: First it is important to acknowledge that most of the animals that are adopted succumb to illness very soon after arriving at their new home. This is due to the stress involved with their stay at the shelter.Thus the argument that sick animals should not be adopted so as not to promote that the SPCA adopts out sick animals is moot as the public is already familiar with the term “SPCA sickness” as a slang for these stress related illness that occur after the adoption. Second we must acknowledge that allowing that allowing the wholesale viewing of animals in the sick room would be a poor choice since it would place these animals under undue stress and risk further contamination. However those patrons who are actively looking to adopt should be allowed to view all the animals that are up for adoption. This may save a sick animal form the suffering of attempting an unlikely recovery at the shelter and the possibility of being put to sleep. This is yet another step to ensure that all possibilities have been explored prior to killing the animal.

Symptoms: Some animals are killed because they succumbed to an illness that could have been cured if they had found a home; others are killed because of space limitations that could have been avoided. Some patrons do not find their ideal companion because that animal was in the sick room at the time.

Messages In This Thread

1998 letter from Scott and Natasha Baker: Still relevant because not enough has changed
The Vancouver SPCA has completely failed in this regard by: 1. Not providing any form of useful public education
2. Presenting a bad example when dealing with shelter animals
3. Practicing unnecessary euthanasia
A more careful reading of our notes to conversations with Natasha
4. Not providing enough kennels despite the space to do so
5. Not providing young animals with sufficient stimuli
6. Inadequate screening of potential adoptees
7. Being too rigid with respect to enforcing adoption hours
8. Not showing or adopting sick animals
9. No adoption councillor for the dogs
10. The wanton separation of an animal from its personal belongings
11. Insufficient effort to promote the adoption of shelter animals
12. Not suggesting alternatives to the surrender of animals
13. Poor and sometimes cruel displays of animals
14. The complete lack of training of volunteers
15. The complete lack of benefits to the volunteers
16. The complete lack of and adequate job description for volunteers
17. Lack of any hierarchy or chain of command
18. Lack of respect and trust by the staff
19. General lack of manners
20. No attempt to show compassion
21. Lack of a adequate communications channels
22. Lack of follow-up on adoptions
23. Not allowing for the pick-up of a lost cat after visiting hours
24. Misuse of donated funds
25. Inadequate seclusion of “stray” animals
From my time volunteering at the Burnaby SPCA, I came to these conclusions as well
We welcome comment from the SPCA
From the Prince George Free Press
Natasha is just one of hundreds: Brigitta MacMillan also tried to make the SPCA change, with no luck *PIC*
So too did Christine W.
So did Laura Dean
Another letter from Laura Dean
What has changed since November 2001? If I find out that anymore animals have been euthanized, I will go to the media
The organization of as large a scale as the SPCA needs critics and scrutinizing

Share