Animal Advocates Watchdog

Another pit bull attacks, but gets to go home

Another pit bull attacks, but gets to go home

Global BC

Wednesday, March 24, 2004

Charlie is recovering from neck wounds after being attacked in a Yaletown off-leash park Saturday.

VANCOUVER - The owner of a dog attacked by a pit bull last weekend says she is "shocked" the dog has been released back to its owners.

Charlie, a golden retriever, had just arrived at an off-leash park in Vancouver's Yaletown neighbourhood when a pit bull pounced and latched onto his neck.

It took four men more than 10 minutes to free Charlie from his attacker.

"I know that this wasn't what the police called a 'usual dog fight.' This was a vicious pit bull," said Shannon Patterson, Charlie's owner.

The pit bull was taken to the pound, but has since been released to its owners.

"It should not be on the streets," said Patterson. "And I'm a dog lover, [but] this dog should not have been released."

Charlie is recovering from several puncture wounds around his neck.

GUIDE DOG ATTACKED IN VICTORIA

An evening walk turned into a nightmare for a visually impaired Victoria man when pit bulls attacked his guide dog.

Oriano Belusic was walking his wife home with his seven-year-old yellow Lab, Hillie, when a pair of pit bulls viciously attacked his dog Monday night.

Despite help from passing motorists and pedestrians, the attack didn't end until Oriano reached into one of the pit bull's mouths with his prosthetic hand to dislodge it.

Hillie, which Belusic says did nothing to provoke the attack, underwent surgery Tuesday for extensive injuries.

Messages In This Thread

Pit bulls attack seeing-eye dog in Victoria
Re: Pit bulls attack seeing-eye dog in Victoria
The woman who has the dog....
Pit Bull attacks young Golden Retriever at Vancouver off leash park and then the City pound returns the pit bull to the owner!
Reaction to attack on Golden Retriever by Pit Bull defender is regretably typical
Another pit bull attacks, but gets to go home
Guide Dog On The Mend *LINK* *PIC*
Owners of certain dog breeds may have trouble getting home insurance
Funny thing is...
Spurious argument number one against breed specific controls: Small breeds are just as dangerous as protection/fighting breeds
Spurious argument number five against breed specific controls: Get the dog's owner to carry extra liability insurance
Spurious argument number two against breed specific controls: We just have to make people behave responsibly
Spurious argument number three against breed specific controls: Ban the deed, not the breed
Spurious argument number four against breed specific controls: The "slippery slope" argument
Re: Spurious argument number four against breed specific controls: The "slippery slope" argument
Market corrections are going to take this issue out of the hands of power breed defenders and weak-kneed politicians
Child victims of dog attacks do not die quickly
Dog Bite Law: Severe injuries occur almost exclusively in children less than 10 years of age *LINK*
Pit bulls and Rottweilers 5% in population, 50% of fatal attacks
Victoria: Tougher laws, steeper fines designed to make owners of vicious dogs accountable for actions
Insurance companies are becoming less willing to risk potential lawsuits related to dog bites.
If there has been consideration of holding parents responsible for their children's actions, why are pet owners not?
Sun & Province Letters to the Editor March 26/04
These people are metaphorically throwing children to the wolves
Victoria could add teeth to dog bylaws

Share