Animal Advocates Watchdog

Spurious argument number five against breed specific controls: Get the dog's owner to carry extra liability insurance

The smaller insurance companies may be laughing now, as people switch to them because they are angry with Allstate, but what happens in a year or two when these smaller companies have had to make all the payouts for those 460,000 per year canadian dog bites? Imagine how angry the non-dog policy holders will be to see their policy rates go through the roof.

My guess is that all insurance companies will eventually be forced to follow Allstate's lead.
And Allstate is not the only large insurance company to do this. HSBC Canadian Direct has a similar policy, and will refuse coverage to people with certain dog breeds too.

The only way I can see a reversal to this trend in the insurance business, is for strict dog breeding controls to be implemented and enforced at the Municipal and Provincial levels of government.

The Surrey SPCA and the Calgary Humane Society have both publicly spoken out against Allstate's new policy, and are pointing the finger in advance to blame Allstate for any power breed overflow of dogs they may see in their shelter systems with the new insurance rules in place.

But if these organizations had been focusing on their real mandates all of these years, and had lobbied for breeding controls which they would help enforce,instead of operating as municipal pounds and dumping grounds for owner surrenders, there wouldn't be a problem in the first place.

Messages In This Thread

Pit bulls attack seeing-eye dog in Victoria
Re: Pit bulls attack seeing-eye dog in Victoria
The woman who has the dog....
Pit Bull attacks young Golden Retriever at Vancouver off leash park and then the City pound returns the pit bull to the owner!
Reaction to attack on Golden Retriever by Pit Bull defender is regretably typical
Another pit bull attacks, but gets to go home
Guide Dog On The Mend *LINK* *PIC*
Owners of certain dog breeds may have trouble getting home insurance
Funny thing is...
Spurious argument number one against breed specific controls: Small breeds are just as dangerous as protection/fighting breeds
Spurious argument number five against breed specific controls: Get the dog's owner to carry extra liability insurance
Spurious argument number two against breed specific controls: We just have to make people behave responsibly
Spurious argument number three against breed specific controls: Ban the deed, not the breed
Spurious argument number four against breed specific controls: The "slippery slope" argument
Re: Spurious argument number four against breed specific controls: The "slippery slope" argument
Market corrections are going to take this issue out of the hands of power breed defenders and weak-kneed politicians
Child victims of dog attacks do not die quickly
Dog Bite Law: Severe injuries occur almost exclusively in children less than 10 years of age *LINK*
Pit bulls and Rottweilers 5% in population, 50% of fatal attacks
Victoria: Tougher laws, steeper fines designed to make owners of vicious dogs accountable for actions
Insurance companies are becoming less willing to risk potential lawsuits related to dog bites.
If there has been consideration of holding parents responsible for their children's actions, why are pet owners not?
Sun & Province Letters to the Editor March 26/04
These people are metaphorically throwing children to the wolves
Victoria could add teeth to dog bylaws

Share