Animal Advocates Watchdog

Sun & Province Letters to the Editor March 26/04

Friday, March 26, 2004

Re: Guide dog on the mend after mauling, March 26

When I read that one of the pit bulls that attacked a guide dog in Victoria has been put down and one remains locked up, I wondered why the owner is not locked up as well. A dog that is well socialized, gets love, exercise and humane training is not dangerous.

It's also interesting that almost all the dogs that spend their lives endlessly chained or caged and left alone in yards are from those "dangerous" breeds. It is the treatment of those animals that results in injuries, trauma and sometimes tragedy. Many people keep dogs from those breeds as weapons, and they should be liable.

Laura Hamm

Vancouver Sun 2004

Macho dog owners to blame for bites

Friday, March 26, 2004
Readers place the blame on dog owners -- not the dog - when pit bulls attack.
CREDIT: The Associated Press

Charley, the dog attacked by a pit bull in Yaletown, is known to most of us that live in the area. He is a friendly, loveable dog. But it's not the pit bull that is at fault, it's the macho types who have these vicious, destructive animals.

There are many pit bulls in the area that are friendly and well-behaved. There are also the ones whose owners sit back and let them run loose in parks while they destroy flowers, shrubs and childrens' swings.

The dog that attacked Charley should be put down and the owner handed a large fine. Maybe if the fines were large enough, these owners would be more responsible.

Patricia Barker,

Vancouver
© The Vancouver Province 2004

Macho dog owners to blame for bites

Letter

Friday, March 26, 2004

In some municipalities there are laws for dogs such as pit bulls. And I don't care if you don't like it -- the law says muzzle the dog when it's outside.

If you aren't prepared to muzzle your pit bull then don't have it. The reason for the muzzle is clear. None of us are strong enough to pry a pit bull's jaws open if it decides to attack.

Meredith Cooke,

Maple Ridge
© The Vancouver Province 2004

Macho dog owners to blame for bites

Letter

Friday, March 26, 2004

I believe the animals that attacked the guide dog in Victoria should be destroyed.

I'm astounded these obviously vicious animals were sent home to an owner that apparently can not handle these dogs. What if it was a child these pit bulls had gotten ahold of!

Mandy Menzies,

Surrey
© The Vancouver Province 2004

Messages In This Thread

Pit bulls attack seeing-eye dog in Victoria
Re: Pit bulls attack seeing-eye dog in Victoria
The woman who has the dog....
Pit Bull attacks young Golden Retriever at Vancouver off leash park and then the City pound returns the pit bull to the owner!
Reaction to attack on Golden Retriever by Pit Bull defender is regretably typical
Another pit bull attacks, but gets to go home
Guide Dog On The Mend *LINK* *PIC*
Owners of certain dog breeds may have trouble getting home insurance
Funny thing is...
Spurious argument number one against breed specific controls: Small breeds are just as dangerous as protection/fighting breeds
Spurious argument number five against breed specific controls: Get the dog's owner to carry extra liability insurance
Spurious argument number two against breed specific controls: We just have to make people behave responsibly
Spurious argument number three against breed specific controls: Ban the deed, not the breed
Spurious argument number four against breed specific controls: The "slippery slope" argument
Re: Spurious argument number four against breed specific controls: The "slippery slope" argument
Market corrections are going to take this issue out of the hands of power breed defenders and weak-kneed politicians
Child victims of dog attacks do not die quickly
Dog Bite Law: Severe injuries occur almost exclusively in children less than 10 years of age *LINK*
Pit bulls and Rottweilers 5% in population, 50% of fatal attacks
Victoria: Tougher laws, steeper fines designed to make owners of vicious dogs accountable for actions
Insurance companies are becoming less willing to risk potential lawsuits related to dog bites.
If there has been consideration of holding parents responsible for their children's actions, why are pet owners not?
Sun & Province Letters to the Editor March 26/04
These people are metaphorically throwing children to the wolves
Victoria could add teeth to dog bylaws

Share