Animal Advocates Watchdog

Re: Spurious argument number four against breed specific controls: The "slippery slope" argument

Unfortunately it is not.

What we might face is not a ban on chihuahas, which btw actuall is a silly remark. What we might face is more problems insuring dogs and homes. Problems bringing dogs on public transportations, licenses to breed dogs which only serves as a hidden taxation, bans from owning more than one dog and so on. Not problems for you and me. At least not today but as the limitations increase problems will arise and it will have severe consequenses.

To me we it is clear that dog owners must start fending for themselves and not accept our rights being taken away from us because there are a few rotten apples in the basket. We must also start to speak out about what the real problem is, irresponsible breeding and ownership and of course, the main problem, irresponsible media coverage that makes the wrong people want to own a dog thus being the underlying reason behind the problem.

Pointing fingers will not lead to a positive result. It will only make us dog owners weaker as a group and the problems harder to solve.

Bo Svensson
Swedish Pitbull terrier Federation

Messages In This Thread

Pit bulls attack seeing-eye dog in Victoria
Re: Pit bulls attack seeing-eye dog in Victoria
The woman who has the dog....
Pit Bull attacks young Golden Retriever at Vancouver off leash park and then the City pound returns the pit bull to the owner!
Reaction to attack on Golden Retriever by Pit Bull defender is regretably typical
Another pit bull attacks, but gets to go home
Guide Dog On The Mend *LINK* *PIC*
Owners of certain dog breeds may have trouble getting home insurance
Funny thing is...
Spurious argument number one against breed specific controls: Small breeds are just as dangerous as protection/fighting breeds
Spurious argument number five against breed specific controls: Get the dog's owner to carry extra liability insurance
Spurious argument number two against breed specific controls: We just have to make people behave responsibly
Spurious argument number three against breed specific controls: Ban the deed, not the breed
Spurious argument number four against breed specific controls: The "slippery slope" argument
Re: Spurious argument number four against breed specific controls: The "slippery slope" argument
Market corrections are going to take this issue out of the hands of power breed defenders and weak-kneed politicians
Child victims of dog attacks do not die quickly
Dog Bite Law: Severe injuries occur almost exclusively in children less than 10 years of age *LINK*
Pit bulls and Rottweilers 5% in population, 50% of fatal attacks
Victoria: Tougher laws, steeper fines designed to make owners of vicious dogs accountable for actions
Insurance companies are becoming less willing to risk potential lawsuits related to dog bites.
If there has been consideration of holding parents responsible for their children's actions, why are pet owners not?
Sun & Province Letters to the Editor March 26/04
These people are metaphorically throwing children to the wolves
Victoria could add teeth to dog bylaws

Share